|
SuperAdrianK said: I don't see what you did thar. I would love to see linkz reasoning on voting stefl over me and nen, speaking of which, my suspicions on nen havn't change, so I'm just going to; vote:nen Also, nen made a big blunder and not many people jumped on it, which I believe it was prof, linkz, and ff. Unlike mines when nord, zexen, ff, prof (but for different reasons... I guess.), Linkz (he said he voted me for alot of reasons), and nen. If I've never made that post, I think most of the votes wouldn't be on me now, lol but its too late for that now. (who I guess tried to defend me at the same time? I assume he just wants me to be associated with him if he turns out mafia). |
From http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3836985 and http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=121394&page=9:
"I demand (lol) that if the one who is lynched today is town we try lynch the other one!"
"I believe that if one of them is scum every possible scumvote is on the other one, if they both are town I also believe they have their votes focused, if both are scum it is likely that the votes of scum are scattered..."
The first line I thought to be a joke, but Stefl is going through with it. I just feel like Stefl is picking on an easy target since many people are suspicious of you, and it may be a plan to hurry the lynch along and get minimal information today.
The second line is where I see a failure in logic. As already pointed out by myself and prof, the scumvotes could be anywhere. But going by Stefl's own logic, since scottie was town:
If SAK is scum, then every possible scumvote was on scottie.
If SAK is town, then the mafia had their votes focused. With 9 unknown alignments voting for scottie to 3 unknowns on SAK, it's pretty likely that any "focusing" was on scottie.
So by Stefl's logic, several if not all of the mafia are sitting right in the group of 9 that voted for scottie and are still alive. Given that, it would be far more telling to look into those players than to just vote for you.
Now don't misunderstand me. I'm not defending you at all. You're still second or third(with nen) on my list. It's just that I'm more suspicious of Stefl at the moment.
You're going to have to restate the last bits, because I have no clue what you're trying to say. Who tried to defend you?
