Viper1 said:
Garnett said:
TheSource said:
When I argue about this with him, I just remind him that Nintendo is likely to announce the Wii successor for late 2011 / late 2012 to kill off any momentum Move might be building.
The fact of the matter is a Wii HD starts with a base of "0 Users" as does the PS3 Move base. So an HD Wii is 75-80m behind X360/PS3 if it releases in 2010, and the PS3 base for Move is going to be 75-80m behind Wii when it launches this year
|
By the time the Wii HD does come out, the PS3 would of already done everything the Wii HD does. (It only does everything!!!)
HD console = PS3
HD format = PS3
Good online service = PS3
Motion controls = PS3
The PS3 MOVE user base may start from Zero but remember, its gonna have a 2-3 year head start, and in 2-3 years the PS3 may be at 50 million plus, so Move will be accessable to those 50 million current PS3 owners, and all for $100 or less. Compared to the Wii HD which will probably launch at $200-300 and without a decent online service and Blue Ray.
Nintendo is gonna have a problem if Sony decides to Bundle it with EVERY ps3, for one price.
|
Did you buy your crsytal ball from the same shady street vendor that Pacther did?
It's good to know that someone already knows the price, the online service and game medium for a console that Nintendo says is not even under consideration.
|
Chances are Nintendo wont improve the online, because most of their customers dont care about online.
Why would the Wii HD, an Updated version of the Current gen Wii be cheaper? Its going to be more expensive.
As for the Media format,Nintendo goes with their own formats.
