highwaystar101 on 14 May 2009
| CHYUII said: Evolution is a philosophy because scientific method can never be applied to it. We have no way of researching it, because we have no way of reproducing the moments in which life was created on Earth. If it is a fact then scientist would not still call it a theory. Statistically speaking it is very improbable that random chance gave rise to order (not to mention it is against the PROVEN Laws of Science). Darwin said that if it could be proven that life forms did not become more complicated over a series of successive improvements, then his theory would be proven wrong. Micheal Denton an atheist wrote a book called evolution: a theory in Crisis, He spent the first part of the book ripping religion. And then went on to make his case- And he is not alone in those beliefs other scientist believe the same. I am not anti- science but I am Anti- Dogma and the theory of Evo. is sometimes just that. I believe in Micro but not Macro. The rest is more in line with Intelligent Design because Intelligent Design is more inline with the ACTUAL LAWS of SCIENCE. But this is a free country and I do not mean to step on anothers beliefs, we are free to worship as we choose... |
Theory =/= fact
It really annoys me when people think that a theory is just an untested idea or something. A theory has had to of been tested and examined beyond the realms of "just an idea", it has to have a lot of tested evidence backing it up to become a theory. If it was testable but no evidence existed then it would be a hypothesis.
