I could be wrong, but I thought it was a well-known fact that PC graphics >>>>>>>>> PS3 graphics.

Besides, only the most hardcore of obsessed fans will really see much of a difference between PS3 & 360 games, when playing, and frankly, the vast majority of people doesn't care.

I did some research. The only other examples of downgraded ports are from porting graphically superior games from Xbox and Gamecube to the inferior PS2, whereas porting from the PS2 to these more powerful systems universally resulted in improved graphics and performance.

Yes, but you're still rendering a total of 720p (or there abouts) only with more geometry. Since the system now has to render the same game from 2 entirely different viewpoints. 

If the hit for split-screen was minimal those games would have it and therefor there is no-excuse for their sequels not to have it, since both of those franchises have multiplayer modes, there is no reason not to offer local play (since they both offer local system link) .

LOL  this is so funny,  360 real fanboys will NEVER accept that Sony is setting the graphics bar this generation on consoles  hahaha they keep spinin and doin damage control  lol  

remember all the Alan Wake hype? Alan wake was supossed to beat all ps3 exclusives  but it failed , lol not even hd , pathetic 520p or somthing

Why did you bump a 4 month old thread?

1) I had things to say.

2) Dunno why, but this topic appeared on my screen as "hot topic" so I clicked it, read it and responded. I didn't realise it was an old thread until after.

Nope, posts like this are pathetic. You are, sir, the definition of a graphic whore

BTW... I don't know what syystem this game will go to, but this is my graphic king for the month (along Kirby Epic Yarn!).

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-hardcorps-uprising/700567

(damn, can't embed videos! help!)

i can see a lot of crow eating in here.