Know something we don't?

Ok, I'm a bit confused..
First Hatmoza comes and starts acting a bit crazy so WoW (And more people) start jumping into him, later when he says "wth WoW" and she answers with "contribute or get lynched" he suddenly doesn't care what she thinks anymore. After that he is starts saying that we should lynch the lurkers because it's the best, which is not really correct.. I'm pretty sure that most of the time lurkers have ended up being towny that apparently didn't care much about the game (like RTC), when WoW says that's being scummy (which it is) he justifies himself by saying that's what he can offer (And I think saying something like that is lame..) when WoW ask him for his lurker option, he says that a consistent luker like me or dtewi.. Ok.. let's stop there.. He wants to lynch a "lurker" judging from previous games when he is acting pretty much like past games in which he has been anti-town.

Let's look at at what hatmoza has done so far..
- Acting crazy
- Say "lynch a lurker" (and specially me)
- Defy WoW saying that she will suffer when he appears as pro town
- Have this "stick with what I think 'till the end" mentality

Just because you claim to be pro town this game aint meant that eveybody will think the same, Hatmoza.

Now let's continue..

He claimed this "WoW is intimidated by my consistency".. Ok.. Could somebody tell my a reason of why would WoW be intimidated for a consistency of being a crazy player who got himself lynched (or killed) everytime inventing roles and making no sense? I can't think in anything.. Yeah you got a MVP Mafia, but that doesn't really mean that were exaclty the best player, just that you were the best mafia, and to be honest the mafia didn't shine in that game, now, I'm not saying you played bad.. You actually almost made everybody believe you, but between dsister and DBN that didn't go too far.

After that he got voted and he apparently is proud of his attitude and claim that it makes experience players and he threaten WoW, like he has done in past games. Then he voted No lynch and when sfb made fun because he didnt say a reason he said that he wanted to vote for a lurker but since it's not going to happen he just voted no lynch and said that eventhough he is gonna get lynched he doesn't care because he never give up.. the hell? Are you some sort of kamikaze, hatmoza? That's the attitude that has killed you in most (if not all) games.. It's like when Carl was a pro town role (and many times a good one) and when he was being voted all that he did was.. "I'm pro town stop voting for me or you will see tomorrow". I don't know what you think hatmoza but "never give up" in those cases doesn't make you look like a hero or brave.

Later he tried to blame WoW of his craziness when even himself said it early and when zex stated his past mistakes he claims again that WoW just want him because of his apparently "awesome" consistency and start bragging about he has lived longer in the past 2 times and his award that while show that he played better, also show that mafia wasnt exactly the best in that last game.

And now he's justifying himself saying he doesn't pay attention of what he says in first day and that he calms down after it.

(now if you all excuse me this post took me like 1hr and I really have to sleep lol)

Yeah, this is what gets me about him. If he really were guilty I couldn't see him digging this grave 

vote: no lynch 

I really dont think there is any good reason to vote for someone at this point, people are being jumpy and random, certainly there are people who are slightly suspicious, but voting for any of them would be little more than a hunch and a big risk at this point imo.

Most people have it set to 50. That used to be the normal standard until you were allowed to chose. Why are you asking?