Wow, what a terribly written review - and I don't mean the funny Google translation posted on N4G which translates the word "Titel" to "book" instead of the correct and obviously a bit more similar word "title".

I mean the review in its original language. The reviewer gives no real reason WHY he enyjoyed the game so much. Basically he just says several times that he loved characters, graphics, sound, atmosphere, gameplay and again the graphics. Everything's brilliant and - quote -breathtaking. He's so enthusiastic about the game that he forgot to tell his audience why.

Also, he lists Kein "Spiel"? (No "game"?) as a con though it's obviously not HIS con, but it seems he unnecessarily and proactively tries to express with this clumsy wording that Heavy Rain might not be considered as game by many others. So it seems he's not only incapable of properly expressing his opinion but he's also insecure...

Anyway, I can't wait to play the game. I have one concern which none of the (few) videos or previews I've seen could dispell and which differs from anyone else's concerns. I'm probably alone with this and I'll find out in exactly one month.

Yes a lot. What is a game is highly personal. The definition of game is simply "An activity providing entertainment or amusement". So working can be a game for certain person. Also doing laundry could be a game. He said cons "no game?" instead of just saying that it ressemble more to an interactive movie than usual video-game. But then again, it makes absolutely no sense to gave it a 9.2 out of 10 if the cons is the whole gameplay. Gameplay in cons should mean 8 or lower at least. Or maybe he thought that even if he liked it, it could  be a negative point for the average gamer.

I don't mind if someone says they give up.

I also explained why he wrote the in the cons area and what the meaning for it is. As I said he writes it as No "Game" because for many people they may in fact see it this way and will see it as a big time con, just like it was for Dragon's Lair.

Yes maybe he should have worded it better to avoid the confusion we have here.

I also apologize if I misunderstood what your meaning was.