MontanaHatchet said: Hmm, I see. By the way, what's that in your avatar? P.S. OriGin, since that seemed to be a hit and run comment, I'll edit it myself.

You clearly saying I'm a fanboy? lol. I guess you've missed all the times I've defended the PS3 as well. I've never been a fanboy. I just hate shoddy work.

selnor said: MontanaHatchet said: Hmm, I see. By the way, what's that in your avatar? P.S. OriGin, since that seemed to be a hit and run comment, I'll edit it myself. You clearly saying I'm a fanboy? lol. I guess you've missed all the times I've defended the PS3 as well. I've never been a fanboy. I just hate shoddy work.

What? When did I say that?

 

MontanaHatchet said: Hmm, I see. By the way, what's that in your avatar? P.S. OriGin, since that seemed to be a hit and run comment, I'll edit it myself.

 My leg..... my leg......

 

Anyway. . .again, if Warhawk can be updated to improve it's online woes, I'm sure COD4 can be too. It's probably going to take a couple of days to a week (minimum), but that's just my guess.  

 lol, that makes me want a FragFX a little more, but I'd prefer if actual keyboard and mouse support was added to games because all I'd need is a PS/2 to USB adaptor for my keyboard and that doesn't cost $50 (or whatever the FragFX costs). 

MontanaHatchet said: selnor said: MontanaHatchet said: Hmm, I see. By the way, what's that in your avatar? P.S. OriGin, since that seemed to be a hit and run comment, I'll edit it myself. You clearly saying I'm a fanboy? lol. I guess you've missed all the times I've defended the PS3 as well. I've never been a fanboy. I just hate shoddy work. What? When did I say that?

 

Sorry I thought you knew and was being sarcastic.

It's an alien race from Mass Effect.

If you were being genuine I'm sorry. My bad.

 

ripper said: getting excited about .1% that is 1 one thousanth better... that is pretty LAME

One thousandth better? Ok...  Anyway, about the prior discussion involving the 360 controller being to big and awkward...how small are your hands?  They are absolutely perfect for console FPS, read: CONSOLE.  The PS3 controller is SUPER awkward trying to play an FPS, your thumbs are constantly in an unnatural position when playing with the dual analog on a ps3 controller.  The placement of the analogs on the 360 is far superior for shooters in terms of control and comfort.  Oh yeah, I got CoD4 on the 360 and no the PS3, because nothing compares to XBOX Live for online play and matchmaking abilities.  Sure, sony's is free, just like all the fanboys love to reiterate over and over, but who cares?  You get what you pay for, and in the case of sony's, not much at all.

 

I'll post this video I found. Click gtHD it gives much better picture comparison.

http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/video-call-of-duty-4-xbox-360-vs-ps3-graphics-comparison

The 360 footage looks crisper and I believe this is why.

http://www.gametap.com/home/read/article/8a250901160f94bf011611682de606e0

Both Xbox 360 and PS3 use a Native Resolution of 720p.

The Xbox 360 version also has a Native 1920x1080i mode that apparently does not come from an upconverted image from the hardware upconversion chip. This means the Xbox 360 version looks identical to 1080p, because the game runs at 60 frames per second.

The Xbox 360 uses the Hardware Upconversion chip to change the 1920x1080i mode to output in 1080p

There are rumors that say the PS3 version has a Native Resolution of 1080p, because "1080p" appears on the back of the PS3 box, just like the Xbox 360 box, but several website Forums and Gamespot have now confirmed that this is NOT true. The reason the PS3 version can be output in 1080p is because of a software "scalar" program similar to the one used in GT5 that is implemented into the PS3 version in order to make it more compatible with 1080i and 1080p HDTV sets.

Gamespot goes so far as to say that the Playstation 3 version is NEVER seen higher than 720p, even on a 1080p HDTV. This means that the "software scalar" program in this PS3 game isn't nearly as good as the "hardware scalar" chip in the Xbox 360, which truly does let you see the game in a resolution of 1080p that is output from the Xbox 360.

Nevertheless, the "software scalar" on COD4 for the PS3 can be seen in "720p" high-definition on 1080i and 1080p HDTV sets, unlike Resistance for the PS3...so, it is good news that they used the "software scalar" program--otherwise, you would be seeing the PS3 version of COD4 in only 480p resolution. In fact, as of November 7, 2007 it has been confirmed that if you have a 1080i HDTV set, then you will only see the PS3 version of Call of Duty 4 at 480p low-resolution, if you have a 1080i HDTV set.

zackblue said: You heard it here first folks, accoridng to gamerankings the best cod4 is on the playstation 3. followed by the 360 version. Here are the ratings.   PS3: 95.1% 360:95.0% pc 93.4% ds: 78%   So if anyone cant decide between which to versions to buy the ps3 version is the one best suited for you. http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/939213.asp

Also The PS3 verison have 16 ratings. The X360 verison have 27. The PC version got 15 rations, so thats fair to compar.

Yea, I press the info button and 720p pops up, but we have a 1080p TV at home and a 720p/1080i (though a shitty one) at our appartment so meh. . .

Oh come on this is pathetic. The 360 one has 25 reviews and the PS3 one has 14. What the hell did you expect. Seriously for the 360 one to be even that close wiht 11 extra reviews shows something more. This is simply pathetic.

I prefer FPS's on consoles since PC versions always demand the best PC's( high ram, good video card, big hard drive)... I don't have that much money

Plus playing Halo on the computer was horrible it's not the real game, if you would offer me COD4 either on PS3/360 or PC I'd take the PS3/360 version over the PC version any day.