I pre-ordered the game in October but the reviews have put me off. Canceled it today and going to use the money to get either MAG or ModNation Racers which I'm 50/50 interested in.

This games seems great based on review scores.Thats why I wan't to play at best option.
Just like my Pc could run Dead Space, I got it for Ps3 because it would ruin athmosphere when suddenly monsters attack you and game laggs and freezez.(Well that might actually make it scarier when you first hear monster scream and see it far away and after 5 secs freeze you are attacked.Anywayy...)

Bottomline Bayonetta is inferior in a lot of ways. The main character is not attractive, who the fuck likes tall women? Women are more feminine when they're petite. I'll take boobies any day! XD

I'll hear what gamers say about the PS3 version and then decide.

V-r0cK said: nen-suer said: I played the demo and loved it, so am getting it If it weren't for the reviews some of you wouldn't have even noticed the difference Agreed.  And Ill be picking up a copy for PS3 as i enjoyed the demo too. "Though frame rate issues, frequent and extended load times, and less-crisp graphics make the PlayStation 3 version inferior to its Xbox 360 counterpart, it is nonetheless still a very enjoyable experience." - Gamespot 8.0 score. Since when is an +8.0 game not good enough these days?  The media spoiled you all by throwing around +9.0 scores everywhere lol.  ...Didnt Dragon Age have a less score for 360 than the PS3?  Yet its selling over 500k more than the PS3 version.  Seems like 360 owners knows how NOT TO pass up on a good game regardless of being 'inferior' lol

"Unfortunately, the PS3 port of Bayonetta is a very disappointing piece of software. I love Bayonetta -- just look at my review of the 360 version for proof. But Bayonetta on the PS3 is a whole different beast."

"Although Bayonetta has more than a few similarities to Devil May Cry, I believe that this game is worth playing... but it's hard to recommend the PS3 version when the 360 version is so much better. Even when you consider the fantastic combat system, the slowdown and load times really do spoil the fun." IGN PS3 version 8.2 score (360 version 9.5 score)

It's not that 8.0 isn't good enough, it's just that if you have a choice (own both a PS3 and 360) then the 360 version is the better option.

As for Dragon Age:Origins, I'm a 360 owner(as well as PS3), but I passed on the 360 version in order to get the better version on PC. It was better and less expensive as well, a double bonus!

Nah I'm not getting it either. They would have been better releasing it 360 exclusive instead to be quite honest. But hey hopefully this will teach developers a very valuable lesson

No way I'm rewarding Platinum Games & Sega for a shitty port with a pseudo- sexy woman in it.

nen-suer said: V-r0cK said: nen-suer said: I played the demo and loved it, so am getting it If it weren't for the reviews some of you wouldn't have even noticed the difference Since when is an +8.0 game not good enough these days?  The media spoiled you all by throwing around +9.0 scores everywhere lol.  ...Didnt Dragon Age have a less score for 360 than the PS3?  Yet its selling over 500k more than the PS3 version.  Seems like 360 owners knows how NOT TO pass up on a good game regardless of being 'inferior' lol  Nice post

ahah thanks! 

I have bought it, I like this game, so I bought the PS3 version..

terrible demo and terrible port, wont buy it