By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS3 players getting screwed?

VyseLegend on 28 December 2009

Short answer: yes.



"Why does everyone ask about Chrono Trigger? (responding to a comment about the title being loved) That's not what the sales tell me! If people want a sequel, they should buy more!" - Square Enix Senior Vice President Shinji Hashimoto

Around the Network
XxXProphecyXxX on 28 December 2009

Multiplats this days looks identical most of the time, there are few titles that do not run well on ps3 due to several issue and the 360 gets its share of "inferior" multiplats aswell like Dragon age,burnout etc...



IIXShogunXII on 28 December 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Multiplats this days looks identical most of the time, there are few titles that do not run well on ps3 due to several issue and the 360 gets its share of "inferior" multiplats aswell like Dragon age,burnout etc...


You have to take into account that these things balance out. Dragon Age has better Graphics on Ps3 but some framerate issues. Dragon Age has worse graphics on the 360 but the smoothest and most solid framerate. (This is not according to me, this is according to reviewers such as IGN etc.)



I am not going to argue with you. It will simply be a waste of my time, and yours.

Attoyou on 28 December 2009
wholikeswood said:

I think we've reached the point now where there are only micro-differences between most multiplatform titles on PS3 and 360.

Then once in a while you get a sloppy port like Bayonetta and this issue crops up again.

Regarding Fallout 3 though - was the PS3 version supposed to be worse than the 360 version? I've played both and never noticed anything different...

i have spent a good amount of time on both , The PS3 version seems too Freeze up a little more , but other then that the differences are Small



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

XxXProphecyXxX on 28 December 2009

@Shogun

PS3 version also have faster loading time, tho these are such minor differences that I just dont get why ppl make such big deal out off....its not like evry single multiplats that comes out on ps3 has a major issue like Bayonetta, notice why reviewers give same score on most multiplats for both console.



Around the Network
dharh on 29 December 2009

We are getting screwed on PS3 games because game studios are not using their A team to do the ports.

As far as fallout 3 goes, I have had no problems with it on the PS3. I wouldn't even consider getting the X360 version.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.
iLLmaticV3 on 29 December 2009

Its not as bad as it was before. At least now the differences are so small you barely even notice them, if at all.



Odd. Future. Wolf. Gang. Kill. Em. All. OFWGKTA Don't give a fuck!

Fuck Steve Harvey. FREE EARL!

Final Fantasy Versus XIII will be the GREATEST game EVER made!!!

I'd take a bullet for Square-Enix! 

 

luvtospooge on 29 December 2009
Attoyou said:
wholikeswood said:

I think we've reached the point now where there are only micro-differences between most multiplatform titles on PS3 and 360.

Then once in a while you get a sloppy port like Bayonetta and this issue crops up again.

Regarding Fallout 3 though - was the PS3 version supposed to be worse than the 360 version? I've played both and never noticed anything different...

i have spent a good amount of time on both , The PS3 version seems too Freeze up a little more , but other then that the differences are Small

Some inferior lightning, more glithches, freeze up a little more and yeah i guess that it.