Well before the first stimulus is even spent.  Pelosi wants more!  What do you think?

They want to "create" more jobs.  Heard that before

I think the nightmare continues.

First of all, it was Bush who asked for the original stimulus package, not Obama. Why do you bother with all these Obama-hate threads? Don't you stop to think that maybe, just maybe, these guys might have a better understanding of economics than you. And your profile says you're not even American!
Your signature shows how biased and dogmatic you are, so maybe I shouldn't even try to tell you how the world actually works.

Well, it was Bush and Pelosi.

Bush broke party ranks on that one.

In Response. When you sign off on 1 trillion in out of the ordinary spending for job creation, every unemployed person becomes your fault.

Are they mailing more checks or is it just public works projects?

Yay, more printed money to buy a new economy!


@Ultimate - Where did the OP say anything about Obama? He only mentioned Pelosi.

At any rate, this is stupidity at its finest. Keynesian economics only work if your going to put the money into something worthwhile. That has not been the case with any stimulus money of the past year plus. Way to pay off your corporate sponsors, senators and congressmen.

So it's totally OK for Bush to spend about that much money on war, but not okay for Obama to ask a third of that so more jobs can be created?

@mrstickball - Read his sig.

That's a bad comparisson.

Think of it this way.

It it ok to drink 3 beers?

Is it ok to drink 1 beer when you have a severly damaged liver?

When the Iraq war started we were "healthy".

Also... you know.  Iraq was a bipartisian effort... no matter how people try to run from that now.

If the democrats were against it... it wouldn't of passed.

It's ironic... you keep making the same falacies of logic you were accusing CommunistHater of making.

What about the fact Obama is spending it on war AND job development that has gone nowhere? At least Bush spent it on one thing.

You can't try to justify Obama's idiocy by using Bushes idiocy as justification. Neither were right. The only difference is that Obama is spending far, far more.

Do your politicians even realiser how much debt they're in? Or do they just stick their heads in the sand and pretend it doesn't exist?

If they do they're hugely negligent and history wont be kind to them.