By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Obama And LittleBigPlanet Team Up, For Kids

http://kotaku.com/5410944/obama-and-littlebigplanet-team-up-for-kids

The White House is announcing today a program to improve science and math education with a variety of Entertainment Software Association-backed initiatives including a program to put LittleBigPlanet in libraries as well as a $300,000 game design challenge.

President Barack Obama announced the overarching directive that the gaming plans are part of at a White House press conference that furthers the Administration's commitment to its STEM program, an initiative for focusing on science, technology engineering and math education. The new push is dubbed "Educate to Innovate."

Among the participating private-backed initiatives that are part of the program, according to a run-down in the New York Times, is a two-year focus on science on Sesame Street, a commercial-free science programming commitment by the Discovery Channel, a new website backed by Time Warner Cable, as well as a variety of video game initiatives.

"Our industry's lifeblood is the energy and innovation of new, emerging developers," Michael Gallagher, president of the Entertainment Software Association, the industry's lobbying group, said in a press release today. "To create the next generation's epic titles and incredibly immersive storylines, we need America's youth to have strategic and analytic thinking skills along with complex problem solving abilities. It is my hope that it will produce games that will have a lasting impact on the STEM skills our nation's students so desperately need."

The Sony LittleBigPlanet initiative, Game Changers, is part of a $2 million 2010 Digital Media and Learning Competition funded by the MacArthur foundation. It involves Sony donating 1000 PlayStation 3s and copies of LittleBigPlanet to libraries and community organizations. Participants will strive to create levels that involve science, technology, engineering and math.

A second program, called the Stem National Video Game Competition, was also announced. It is a three-pronged $300,000 contest encouraging entrants to create the best browser video games that teach the STEM disciplines for a trio of age ranges: 4-8, 8-12 and 12-16. This competition is intended to reach "historically underserved populations including girls and minority students," according to an ESA press release. Specifics for this contest will be announced in early 2010, with winners showcased at E3 in June.

The gaming initiatives announced today are backed by the Information Technology Industry Council, an advocacy group. Microsoft and the Games4Change group are also both involved in these plans, according to the ESA release.

More details about both contests will be announced in the next few weeks, according to the ESA.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

What a great idea, I know a lot of you guys love politics, what do you think the reaction to this will be?

I personally think that LBP is a great product and is one of the most powerful level design programs in the biz. Great for kids.

I remember when I was young, Sim City was on all the library computers because it taught valuable skills. I wish it was LBP instead. Lucky little bastards.



Around the Network

Huh. Well good if most of this stuff is being given away for free.

All for more spending in the name of science though using LBP is an odd choice.



I'm glad that Obama realizes that gaming isn't bad for kids.



^yeah, FINALLY someone realizes that gaming is a powerful teaching tool.

Shit I knew more about country capitals and history and had a larger vocabulary simply from playing Civ2.

While this game doesn't teach those kinds of things, it does teach more abstract skills like, well, abstraction, reasoning, planning and development, and also teamwork.



If Sony's gaming division is in the red i know where to look.

1000 PS3's they cost like what 340 to manufacture/shipping etc.

-340,000. not including LBP








Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Around the Network
Serious_frusting said:
If Sony's gaming division is in the red i know where to look.

1000 PS3's they cost like what 340 to manufacture/shipping etc.

-340,000. not including LBP






340$?

the old ps3 was cheaper than that.



theprof00 said:
Serious_frusting said:
If Sony's gaming division is in the red i know where to look.

1000 PS3's they cost like what 340 to manufacture/shipping etc.

-340,000. not including LBP






340$?

the old ps3 was cheaper than that.

no the new ps3 is cheaper than the new one and they just sell the old ps3 for 300 dollars for the customers but to create it prob costs them 340 and they lose money on each ps3 sold and thats it :P



Between the Air Force buying PS3s to build a supercomputer to the White House buying PS3s to teach kids how to make America awesome, Sony must be pretty happy.



 

 

Serious_frusting said:
If Sony's gaming division is in the red i know where to look.

1000 PS3's they cost like what 340 to manufacture/shipping etc.

-340,000. not including LBP






yep. theyll probably be 340,000 below profit level. Fucking kids and their development.



Ghazi4 said:
theprof00 said:
Serious_frusting said:
If Sony's gaming division is in the red i know where to look.

1000 PS3's they cost like what 340 to manufacture/shipping etc.

-340,000. not including LBP






340$?

the old ps3 was cheaper than that.

no the new ps3 is cheaper than the new one and they just sell the old ps3 for 300 dollars for the customers but to create it prob costs them 340 and they lose money on each ps3 sold and thats it :P

No, the old ps3 costed 340$ as of June or so. My bad, it actually costed them 440 or so as of sometime earlier in the year.

And, it doesn't cost them 340$ per unit anymore. They literally have thousands upon thousands of these things lying around. Getting rid of them :

a) decreases on warehouse storage needs, lower costs to hold them

b) is marketing

c) gives them a tax write-off

So, no, it doesn't cost them anything because they've already been paid for, and they are getting a pretty reasonable compensation for them.