By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Modern Warfare 2 cost revealed

FaRmLaNd said:
No they didn't make 700 million profit. They don't get 100% of the disc sales, since microsoft gets a cut and the brick and mortar stores are pricing it more then ab sells the disc to them.

So not only does microsoft get its cut, they're selling the disks to retail at a cheaper price then the $55 average price. Now I have no idea just hot much they make per game sold but it isn't anywhere near $55.

And movies are a very different beast compared to games and the comparisons are really silly because in america the distributers get 90% of the first week ticket sales which dimishes in a sliding scale after that. So whilst I film may only make 100 million in its first week, that in many cases translates into 90 million revenue for the distributer. In the rest of the world its generally a fixed percentage which goes anywhere from about 60% to 20% depending on the country. But its general its considered to be about 50% on average. So if a film makes 100 million in america first week and 100 million in the rest of the world its pretty reasnable to think it make around 140 million.

And the box office doesn't include Television rights and DVD/BR sales. So comparing a films Box office to a games gross really isn't a good comparison at all.

since this is activision reporting the numbers then I assumed theyd be reporting their own numbers... or do they get a part of retails cut? Anyway. If we are going by retails revenue then they only shipped 9 million?

Around the Network
Attoyou said:
my bet is PS3 was a huge cost of that 50 million .

My bet is you're wrong.

Do people really still have that misconception? 



KylieDog said:
$40-50 million and it still looks like ass?

As much as I thought the comment about how it looked AWESOME was absurd, I am finding the bashing of MW2's graphics to also be on the absurd side.  The game looks good.  Fine, plug in "but ______ looks better!".  Other games may, but it absurd to say that MW2 looks horrible.  It doesn't.



richardhutnik said:
KylieDog said:
$40-50 million and it still looks like ass?

As much as I thought the comment about how it looked AWESOME was absurd, I am finding the bashing of MW2's graphics to also be on the absurd side.  The game looks good.  Fine, plug in "but ______ looks better!".  Other games may, but it absurd to say that MW2 looks horrible.  It doesn't.

I am with you brotha, the game looks good.  No it isn't top of the line in the graphics department but its certainly in the top 10 easily.  As long as the game is fun and people like playing it who cares.  People will find anything and everything to run a product into the ground if they don't like it.  So if it makes them feel better to run it down let them.

 

I for one can complain about other things that actually matter,  like 90% of the games multiplayer maps are designed for friggin campers. :D  So to those of you who like to pitch a tent and camp all the time,  YOU SUCK DONKEY DONGS!!!!!!! :D



"If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow."

Quote by- The Imortal John Wayne, the original BADASS!

 

 

 

well the marketing campaign worked :/ but graphics cud've been a whole lot better but i think their time constraint and keeping the multiplatform titles as close to similar as possible had something to do with it. But by that in no means do i mean cod looks bad that game looks fantastic! 



Around the Network
damndl0ser said:
richardhutnik said:
KylieDog said:
$40-50 million and it still looks like ass?

As much as I thought the comment about how it looked AWESOME was absurd, I am finding the bashing of MW2's graphics to also be on the absurd side.  The game looks good.  Fine, plug in "but ______ looks better!".  Other games may, but it absurd to say that MW2 looks horrible.  It doesn't.

I am with you brotha, the game looks good.  No it isn't top of the line in the graphics department but its certainly in the top 10 easily.  As long as the game is fun and people like playing it who cares.  People will find anything and everything to run a product into the ground if they don't like it.  So if it makes them feel better to run it down let them.

 

I for one can complain about other things that actually matter,  like 90% of the games multiplayer maps are designed for friggin campers. :D  So to those of you who like to pitch a tent and camp all the time,  YOU SUCK DONKEY DONGS!!!!!!! :D

If I put on my Shio/Vlad hat here, I can say just download the PC version and hack it so you can see through walls and kill the nasty campers.



Tease.

They used the marketing money to bribe FOX. :D



Please register :)

They obviously don't know how to spend their money well...



That 40-50mil has to already include the marketing. If not then I am highly disappointed.



MW2 ads were in many newspapers in my country andthere was crapload of tv ads. heck there was even few news on tv about launch if this game so yeah those 150mln is true. there were definitely ads for it in cinemas(how many copies they made for cinemas around the world? 3.5-4k?).

about the Halo 3 campaign i mistaken it with week one earnings, but then again most of Halo advertisment was made by Pepsi/Cocacola and other companies probably for free cause it was profitable for them. if 25mln for L4D2(and that was reported by valve itself) was made as advertisment budget by valve alone then it's hard to believe that Halo 3 had 40mln budget.

40-50mln budget for game development is true too. majority of that money was spend on dedicated servers for ps3 gamers. i think that holding constantly severs for 4-5mln people cost a lot.