By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Why can't I find the ATI Radion 5870?

So say a much poorer chap such as myself was looking to ATI in the sub $200 range, what should I get. Ive been on the console scene a while now and I am completely out of touch with PC's today.



 

Around the Network
CASS1DY said:
Ati sucks anyway,get a gtx285 or better yet a gtx295

For $100 cheaper than the GTX285 you can get an HD5850 which is 20-30% faster. For $100 cheaper than the GTX295 you can get the 5870 which is comparable or 5-10% less performing in some Nvidia sponsored games.

The single fastest card is the 5870. The single fastest dual-card setup is two 5870s.

I don't want to get into additional features. AMD has Eyefinity, DX10.1, DX11 and Stream. Nvidia has CUDA and PhysX. None of those are really used much at the moment or significantly add to the experience. Reliability is definitely against Nvidia given the G8x and G9x failures that Nvidia admitted to. Power consumption, noise and temperatures favours the 5xxx series compared to the GTX2xx series.

So why are those better? And more importantly, where is Nvidia's competitor to the 5xxx, or their high-end 40nm parts at all?

And if those two are so good, why have they all but discontinued the GTX275, 285 and 295? Stocks are very low and pricing has crept up due to lack of supply - but unlike the 5xxx that lack isn't due to demand.

--

@Adjudicator

Depends. Raw performance, I'd say a 4870 1GB for $155 or 4890 for $170. If you care more about power consumption or DX11 support, the HD5750 at $170 is a better option. Depends on what games you play; a 4850 ($100) would play almost all games on High settings at 1600x1200 or less.

The Nvidia option is the GTX260 at $165. But the 4890 would be better in that case, as it's $5 more but a lot faster than that premium in percentage terms.



Soleron said:

Depends. Raw performance, I'd say a 4870 1GB for $155 or 4890 for $170. If you care more about power consumption or DX11 support, the HD5750 at $170 is a better option. Depends on what games you play; a 4850 ($100) would play almost all games on High settings at 1600x1200 or less.

The Nvidia option is the GTX260 at $165. But the 4890 would be better in that case, as it's $5 more but a lot faster than that premium in percentage terms.

Thank you for validating my 4890 purchase :)



This is invisible text!

wow getting a 5870, your going top shelf best of the market huh.

i got the economy version 5770



Soleron said:
CASS1DY said:
Ati sucks anyway,get a gtx285 or better yet a gtx295

For $100 cheaper than the GTX285 you can get an HD5850 which is 20-30% faster. For $100 cheaper than the GTX295 you can get the 5870 which is comparable or 5-10% less performing in some Nvidia sponsored games.

The single fastest card is the 5870. The single fastest dual-card setup is two 5870s.

I don't want to get into additional features. AMD has Eyefinity, DX10.1, DX11 and Stream. Nvidia has CUDA and PhysX. None of those are really used much at the moment or significantly add to the experience. Reliability is definitely against Nvidia given the G8x and G9x failures that Nvidia admitted to. Power consumption, noise and temperatures favours the 5xxx series compared to the GTX2xx series.

So why are those better? And more importantly, where is Nvidia's competitor to the 5xxx, or their high-end 40nm parts at all?

And if those two are so good, why have they all but discontinued the GTX275, 285 and 295? Stocks are very low and pricing has crept up due to lack of supply - but unlike the 5xxx that lack isn't due to demand.

--

@Adjudicator

Depends. Raw performance, I'd say a 4870 1GB for $155 or 4890 for $170. If you care more about power consumption or DX11 support, the HD5750 at $170 is a better option. Depends on what games you play; a 4850 ($100) would play almost all games on High settings at 1600x1200 or less.

The Nvidia option is the GTX260 at $165. But the 4890 would be better in that case, as it's $5 more but a lot faster than that premium in per

 

 



Around the Network
Adjudicator said:
So say a much poorer chap such as myself was looking to ATI in the sub $200 range, what should I get. Ive been on the console scene a while now and I am completely out of touch with PC's today.

you can get basically any graphics card you want for sub $200 dollars, besides the afformentioned 5870. 



Adjudicator said:
So say a much poorer chap such as myself was looking to ATI in the sub $200 range, what should I get. Ive been on the console scene a while now and I am completely out of touch with PC's today.

Try here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card,2464.html

And this chart, updated regularly, helps doing fast rough performance comparisons:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card,2464-8.html  (it also gives a rule of thumb to choose a new GPU powerful enough to notice a significant and worthy performance leap)



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW! 
 


Killergran said:
Soleron said:

Depends. Raw performance, I'd say a 4870 1GB for $155 or 4890 for $170. If you care more about power consumption or DX11 support, the HD5750 at $170 is a better option. Depends on what games you play; a 4850 ($100) would play almost all games on High settings at 1600x1200 or less.

The Nvidia option is the GTX260 at $165. But the 4890 would be better in that case, as it's $5 more but a lot faster than that premium in percentage terms.

Thank you for validating my 4890 purchase :)

You're pretty much always going to be better off with an HD 5xxx series.

  • Lower power consumption 1dle/load
  • Will be faster once drivers improve and DX11 is utilised.


Tease.

Whew jus got home from work, thanx guys for the responses

Oh and one more question, do brands matter much like say should I opt for a MSI or ASUS instead of XFX and saphirre



 

They're mostly all the same, however, Sapphire VaporX ones are supposed to keep quite a bit cooler than most, and also, many are factory overclocked, so another thing to look for.



Wii/PC/DS Lite/PSP-2000 owner, shameless Nintendo and AMD fanboy.

My comp, as shown to the right (click for fullsize pic)

CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.2 GHz
Video Card: XFX 1 GB Radeon HD 5870
Memory: 8 GB A-Data DDR3-1600
Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD Pro/USB3
Primary Storage: OCZ Vertex 120 GB
Case: Cooler Master HAF-932
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Extra Storage: WD Caviar Black 640 GB,
WD Caviar Black 750 GB, WD Caviar Black 1 TB
Display: Triple ASUS 25.5" 1920x1200 monitors
Sound: HT Omega Striker 7.1 sound card,
Logitech X-540 5.1 speakers
Input: Logitech G5 mouse,
Microsoft Comfort Curve 2000 keyboard
Wii Friend Code: 2772 8804 2626 5138 Steam: jefforange89