I'm not getting it.

Was going to buy it, played it at my friends house, and I decided to go with Assasins Creed 2

Let's see battlefield bc2 has...

similar looks

40p vs only 18p

better servers

more combat units/veh/planes/etc

far better destruction areas

and BF games always have better controls/playability/etc.

So why would you need to wait for it to release to know BF will be better?

nope not my type of game really and even if it was the F***in game cost like 76 bucks here

I'm not buying it, and I absolutely 100% was going to buy it before they went out of their way to screw it up.

Well if you've played COD4 you know how MW2 plays. Its the same game basicly, but they've removed alot of features for PC gamers, and added more noobfriendly additions to MW2. BF:BC2 looks to be an improved BF:BC, so one can draw some form of opinion based on that without actually playing the game.

We all know what happened with BC1.

Plus, vehicles? Vehicles are just a major camp fest, why would you want those?

If you want a direct comparison, I'd rather play MW1.  I can play with more people, more options, more maps... what am I missing really? 

Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if in a few months, somebody comes out with a MW2-mod for MW1 so I can have all the benefits of both

BC1 was not on PC so I didn't buy it. So idk. BC2 looks fantistic.

I love vehicles and most games I'm in never have much if any camping. I usually form tight squads and have good games. But, that is the PC world vs the typcially childish console arena.

What did happen with BC1?