Well, it's all fine until they poke at YOUR game.

Then, you've got a problem.

@HappySquirrel - In the field of game reviews, 10% is a big difference. Personally I don't like to buy any games that score below a 90% overall.

EDIT: Actually, I think they do this mostly to get attention/site hits...only a small portion of it is their distaste towards the PS3... 

 I was making the point Gamespot does give out generous reviews and high marks and to rather unpexpected games no less. I use to think they were simply one of the harsher review sites, but after reading more of thier reviews and it seems more likely they're actually just one of the lazier ones. From what I've read in some of thier reviews it seems like they often make thier decisions quickly if not before playing the game and seem to miss obvious things at times because they don't really care.

 Then again I've a general disdain for Gaming Media in general, so perhaps I'm not very good judge of these things. 

EDIT: I don't remember anything about them changing how they review games, just that they were going from
.# to .5 or .0 in thier scores. 

I certainly do not agree ...

When you have reviewers scoring the same game as B+, 4/5 and 9/10 and how those are translated into a percentage scale it is easy for a reviewer to be off by more than 10%

 BINGO!

Fanboys do not know the meaning of the word empathy.

When Zelda TP and MP3 got those scores, Sony alliance told the Nintendo fanboys it was ok. Now that they slam a big game from Sony and we all swicth the roles. GS is fine, it is just another sequel.

I am not touching this issue. I always said GS was inconsistent and full of fecal mass. I will not state my opinion about this game.

Well after reading the review, he says the games too easy, but has a hard mode after you beat it. Doesn't say what the hard mode is like, or if satisfies his complaint, or that perhaps it should have been chooseable from the start. Just that it's there.

 Also he complains about it suffering from an identiy crisis, that it can't decide if it's a simple easy adventure or some sort of epic, which I found Kameo suffered from as well.

Other critisim include cliffhanger ending and too many minigames.

Again, I'd kill for more indeapth reviews. Which particular part irked him the most, he seems to bring up it being easy 
the most, so maybe that was his biggest complaint, but he doesn't mention what if anything hard mode is like.

Bah, I'm just killing time to be honest. I'll go do something slightly more constructive. =P 

I'm not blaming Gamespot for being bad reviewers, it's just that I don't think they are consistent enough and it really pisses me off. Some really good games are scored low and some really bad games are sometimes scored high.

I don't hate GS, in fact that's where I usually check for game reviews I just thought R&C was kinda scored low, but like Astrodust said we won't know if that's true until we play it.