didn't kameo only sell like half a million? didn't kameo recieve relatively low scores from reviews? didn't rare do the work for avatars? there is list of reasons kameo didn't get a sequel least of which is natal.

Some people liked Lair too. Every terrible game has fans. Whatever Rares next project, be it better or worse than Kameo, will have fans. Won't make it a good game though, which is not to say it will be terrible.

kameo like pdz couldve and shouldve been so much more, but i dont feel it was a bad game by any stretch of the imagination, it just fell short of its potential

I could care less, honestly. But if motion control gaming becomes the norm, then indeed, I'm going to quit consoles as well.

+1 for the votes against motion control.

I enjoyed the original Kameo, so boo to Natal for this.

I, too, did not like Kameo.

So you're comparing a game that got 79% on metacrtic to a game that got 53 on metacritic? lol

Just cause you say Kameo is bad doesn't make it so. If 79 is bad game then I guess Wii Sports at 76 must be awful.

Only even remotely relevant if metaranking is trusted as a source of game quality, which you offer no reasoning for.

Kameo wasn't a bad game and definitely wasn't a bad launch game.

Another one might have been interesting but it's also a game I wouldn't run out and buy day one.

It sucks but who knows what Rare will have for us instead on Natal...so lets not get out pitch forks out early...