I agree with them! Xbox 360 version is better :)

PC wins again. Next lets see 600p MW2 consoles vs. 1600p PC MW2

if i do get this the PC version it is

WTF? how in the world did the 360 win that?

because it had an 20 seconds less INSTALL time?! REALLY?! You Install it ONCE...ONCE FOR GODS SAKE!!

PS3 textures are FAR FAR FAR FAR BETTER! AND the PS3 DOES have the Sun gleam dude i play the game lol...They didnt even have the sun in the screen shot they posted as a comparison, blatantly biased.

Did you even read what they said? Read it and you'll know why X360 won.....

xbox360 rulessss .

Graphics: The graphics comparison was a little interesting.  On one hand, the PlayStation 3 had a few sharper, higher resolution textures than the Xbox 360.  On the other hand, the Xbox 360 toted some impressive effects that the PlayStation 3 lacked, such as Screen Space Ambient Occlusion (SSAO), sharper shadow maps, and a pretty sweet-looking light bloom effect during certain times of the day.  Due to the circumstances, we felt that the effects implemented by the Xbox 360 were more CPU-intensive and harder to pull off than the higher resolution textures on the PlayStation 3, so this edge goes to the Xbox 360.

xbox 360 win..

Performance: Unfortunately, the performance  wasn’t very impressive on either system.  There were some consistent frame issues on both consoles whenever a gun was fired.  The PlayStation 3 seemed to tear a few frames for no reason sometimes, and definitely didn’t do so well during the cut scenes.  Although the framerate was comparable between the two systems, the Xbox 360 tore less.  Overall we gave this win to the Xbox 360.

PlayStation 3 Avg. FPS: 28.57 / Xbox 360 Avg. FPS: 28.72
PlayStation 3 Avg. Frame Tear: 21.71% / Xbox 360 Avg. Frame Tear: 13.79%

xbox 360 win..

Loading: The PlayStation 3 had a mandatory install of 2371MB but still couldn’t catch up to the Xbox 360.  With an average initial loading time of 21 seconds less than the PlayStation 3, this win goes to the Xbox 360.

xbox360 win..

I did read it...it said 360 won the Graphics comparison due to its Install time and less screen tearing+the Bloom effect (which IS on the PS3 btw)

The only thing that matters of the correct ones is the screen tearing (7% less on the 360) which is not noticable unless your actually measuring it with scientific devices. The human eye cannot pickup on microsecond screen tears so it doesnt even matter...unless 300 straight frames tear then...its complete fail.

Graphics are FAR FAR FAR FAR superior on the PS3.

That comparison was either fixed or someone went blind after taking the screenshots and just guessed on what they looked like when side by side.

Even if the PS3 version won the graphics comparison, the overall winner will still be X360.
The purpose of this comparison isn't all about the graphincs, btw.

I have to agree with the OP, PS3 looks just a hair better. Slightly sharper, and slightly better lighting

PS3 only looks a slight bit better like bou said, then again i'd have to agree with kowen for once and say that its sooo slight it really doesn't matter.