| Xen said: Ah, Samus Aran... what are you on about? Communists being worse than the Nazis? (don't remember communists organizing peoples and sexual orientations, along with the crippled physically/mentally for organized extermination...) Don't remember them desiring to conquer lands just to make space for themselves and SLAVES of the natives (the Eastern expansion...). USSR? China? NK? beans compared to the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia. Seek your examples there. They are also nothing in the face of the Nazi ideology and actions. Also, Hitler doing the same mistake as the Germans did in WWI? may I remind you, that the Germans destroyed Russia in WWI? how is that repeating a mistake? if anything, such a mistake would've let him win. Vanity and pride prevented him from winning in the East. |
Ugh, the Khmer Rouge, now there's an example of the closest thing to "Evil". It pretty much made the workers of Cambodia seems like crap. In comparison, I actually don't think there was ever a regime as "Evil" as the Khmer Rouge. Sure, there is the Middle-East and some areas around Central Africa but Khmer Rouge has a distinctive place. Killing anybody with Glasses because they thought you were literate, looking the leaders in the eye results in immediate death, they would collect the skulls of their corpses, and many more dispicable things.
OT: Communist governments as a whole are up there with Nazis. Khmer Rouge, Maoist China, Stalin USSR, North Korea and Cuba are most notable example. However, considering that Nazis have only had a 10-12 year reign, it makes them seem a lot worse considering that these communists countries (sans USSR) were made after 1945, more than 40 years since the establishment of the Communist ideology. If it only took 12 years to commit the same atrocities done in 40-50 years, then just imagine what it would be like if the Nazi party existed just a slight bit longer.

This is the true definition of owning.








