By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Eastern countries are EVIL!

Samus Aran said:

They didn't want to break that "shit" down, as you said yourself, it was scripted. The Americans wanted to bring down that statue to let the world believe they have freed Iraq.

Iraq is just a political mess like a lot of other countries in the Middle East. I see no improvement there any time soon especially when you have presidents like ahmadinejad that think it's funny to deny the Holocaust.

I really wish I could see improvement like you can when everyday I open my newspaper I see a terrorist attack on countries like Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq,etc

 

 

The event was scripted, for all you know, they could of wanted to do it but couldn't later until the troops allowed it for PR.  Every other fucking thing in the country got destroyed or looted because of the US doing a bad job at security.  You think a statue of their brutal opresser would still be standing otherwise?

You do know he's President of Iran right... and also he's not the "real" ruler of the country.

As for improvement.  Looking at individual attacks is your flaw.  There is going to be terrorist attacks in the middle east for... god knows how often. 

You don't measure by attacks.  You measure by frequency of attacks and by death tolls.  You don't think this stuff wasn't happening when Saddam was in power?  There was his indiscriminate killings and rebels committing terroist attacks.  (Ones the US likely supported.)



Around the Network
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Its USA, not america, its a country that did all those things, not a continent.

USA isnt evil, URSS wasnt evil, both did stupid things and made their own interests the interests of the world and stomped on whatever country they needed in order to fulfill their stupid goals.

Now, on the VG villian part, I could say its just coincidence and has nothing important in it, or I could say some people are just ignorant when they talk about other countries they dont care.

Ok, then stop calling Soccer, Football. 

Since Football is an overarching grouping of many different sports including Rugby and the American and Canadian variations.


? first it has nothing to do, anyway, call your sport american football and call rugby that way, call your national sports the way you like the international one is football and that wont change :P

It has everything to do with it.  It's the same concept.

Complaining about people calling the US, America and calling it Football makes you a hypocrit...

Since in reality "football" is a grouping of sports and not a single sport.

Then call it football association and not soccer, anyway, no other country in america call itself america, its not our fault you dont have a name.

Your arguement still falls flat on it's face since it's still in direct contrast to what you call soccer.  It's not my fault that the rest of the world refers to the United States as "America".

It's the same as Football and Soccer.  USA makes a lot more sense for an abrievation, but when someone who calls soccer football complains about it... i can't help but laugh because it's really ironic.

It's like when an adulterer gets angry when they find out their mistress has cheated on them.

 

First you made a fallacy of analogy(if its called like this in english I dont know), a sports name isnt the same as countries.

Second, the case for America is tthat its a continent, and just one country in that continent calls themselves america, the rest call themselves by their own names. On football, there are many sports, and each of them calls themselves football(USA people call  AF football, and the rest f the world calls AssF football too), in this case, its just that more people play AssF and call it football, soccer is what USA citizens call it so I dont see the abreviation they made is a more correct term.

They are exactly the same.

Except there is no continent called america.  There are two contents that have America in their name.  North America and South America.  However their is no actual "American" continent.

Your arguement in regards to soccer is "more people call their own shit by the wrong name so it's ok."

Which is... well insane logic right there.

There is class, and there are subclasses in that class.

By referring to a subclass as a class you are making an error no matter what your justification for it may be.



Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Its USA, not america, its a country that did all those things, not a continent.

USA isnt evil, URSS wasnt evil, both did stupid things and made their own interests the interests of the world and stomped on whatever country they needed in order to fulfill their stupid goals.

Now, on the VG villian part, I could say its just coincidence and has nothing important in it, or I could say some people are just ignorant when they talk about other countries they dont care.

Ok, then stop calling Soccer, Football. 

Since Football is an overarching grouping of many different sports including Rugby and the American and Canadian variations.


? first it has nothing to do, anyway, call your sport american football and call rugby that way, call your national sports the way you like the international one is football and that wont change :P

It has everything to do with it.  It's the same concept.

Complaining about people calling the US, America and calling it Football makes you a hypocrit...

Since in reality "football" is a grouping of sports and not a single sport.

Then call it football association and not soccer, anyway, no other country in america call itself america, its not our fault you dont have a name.

Your arguement still falls flat on it's face since it's still in direct contrast to what you call soccer.  It's not my fault that the rest of the world refers to the United States as "America".

It's the same as Football and Soccer.  USA makes a lot more sense for an abrievation, but when someone who calls soccer football complains about it... i can't help but laugh because it's really ironic.

It's like when an adulterer gets angry when they find out their mistress has cheated on them.

 

First you made a fallacy of analogy(if its called like this in english I dont know), a sports name isnt the same as countries.

Second, the case for America is tthat its a continent, and just one country in that continent calls themselves america, the rest call themselves by their own names. On football, there are many sports, and each of them calls themselves football(USA people call  AF football, and the rest f the world calls AssF football too), in this case, its just that more people play AssF and call it football, soccer is what USA citizens call it so I dont see the abreviation they made is a more correct term.

They are exactly the same.

Except there is no continent called america.  There are two contents that have America in their name.  North America and South America.  However their is no actual "American" continent.

Your arguement in regards to soccer is "more people call their own shit by the wrong name so it's ok."

Which is... well insane logic right there.

There is class, and there are subclasses in that class.

By referring to a subclass as a class you are making an error no matter what your justification for it may be.

America is a continent. There is no country named america, when you reffer as americans you refer to people that live in the american continent.

Soccer is not the correct name, its an abreviation used only in US. I said people that call it football make a mistake too since its association football, I just said that since more people play this its the only football that matters so when reffering to football people think of association football, not that its correct and its name is just football.

And by no means its the same thing, its a stupid analogy.



pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Its USA, not america, its a country that did all those things, not a continent.

USA isnt evil, URSS wasnt evil, both did stupid things and made their own interests the interests of the world and stomped on whatever country they needed in order to fulfill their stupid goals.

Now, on the VG villian part, I could say its just coincidence and has nothing important in it, or I could say some people are just ignorant when they talk about other countries they dont care.

Ok, then stop calling Soccer, Football. 

Since Football is an overarching grouping of many different sports including Rugby and the American and Canadian variations.


? first it has nothing to do, anyway, call your sport american football and call rugby that way, call your national sports the way you like the international one is football and that wont change :P

It has everything to do with it.  It's the same concept.

Complaining about people calling the US, America and calling it Football makes you a hypocrit...

Since in reality "football" is a grouping of sports and not a single sport.

Then call it football association and not soccer, anyway, no other country in america call itself america, its not our fault you dont have a name.

Your arguement still falls flat on it's face since it's still in direct contrast to what you call soccer.  It's not my fault that the rest of the world refers to the United States as "America".

It's the same as Football and Soccer.  USA makes a lot more sense for an abrievation, but when someone who calls soccer football complains about it... i can't help but laugh because it's really ironic.

It's like when an adulterer gets angry when they find out their mistress has cheated on them.

 

First you made a fallacy of analogy(if its called like this in english I dont know), a sports name isnt the same as countries.

Second, the case for America is tthat its a continent, and just one country in that continent calls themselves america, the rest call themselves by their own names. On football, there are many sports, and each of them calls themselves football(USA people call  AF football, and the rest f the world calls AssF football too), in this case, its just that more people play AssF and call it football, soccer is what USA citizens call it so I dont see the abreviation they made is a more correct term.

They are exactly the same.

Except there is no continent called america.  There are two contents that have America in their name.  North America and South America.  However their is no actual "American" continent.

Your arguement in regards to soccer is "more people call their own shit by the wrong name so it's ok."

Which is... well insane logic right there.

There is class, and there are subclasses in that class.

By referring to a subclass as a class you are making an error no matter what your justification for it may be.

America is a continent. There is no country named america, when you reffer as americans you refer to people that live in the american continent.

Soccer is not the correct name, its an abreviation used only in US. I said people that call it football make a mistake too since its association football, I just said that since more people play this its the only football that matters so when reffering to football people think of association football, not that its correct and its name is just football.

And by no means its the same thing, its a stupid analogy.

Actually Soccer is used in other places too... and was created by England... as an abreviation for "assosiation"  Which would be the correct term if you don't want it abrieviated.  Feel free to call it "Assosiation" if you want to bitch about "America."

Additionally America is NOT a continent.  If you think it is you had a bad Geography teacher.

The "Americas" are two continents.  North and South.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americas

And yes.  They are still identical.  As long as you call it football, you have no room to bitch.  Sorry, but it's true.

It's simple.  You are complaining about a "Class" being used to refer to a "Sub-Class" in one instance... and yet doing the EXACT same thing in another.

What the actual things are isn't important.  This is a language and definition issue.



It really just is because human beings are completely retarded.

 

EDIT: AND quite clearly, the Americans lead the pack of retards.



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Its USA, not america, its a country that did all those things, not a continent.

USA isnt evil, URSS wasnt evil, both did stupid things and made their own interests the interests of the world and stomped on whatever country they needed in order to fulfill their stupid goals.

Now, on the VG villian part, I could say its just coincidence and has nothing important in it, or I could say some people are just ignorant when they talk about other countries they dont care.

Ok, then stop calling Soccer, Football. 

Since Football is an overarching grouping of many different sports including Rugby and the American and Canadian variations.


? first it has nothing to do, anyway, call your sport american football and call rugby that way, call your national sports the way you like the international one is football and that wont change :P

It has everything to do with it.  It's the same concept.

Complaining about people calling the US, America and calling it Football makes you a hypocrit...

Since in reality "football" is a grouping of sports and not a single sport.

Then call it football association and not soccer, anyway, no other country in america call itself america, its not our fault you dont have a name.

Your arguement still falls flat on it's face since it's still in direct contrast to what you call soccer.  It's not my fault that the rest of the world refers to the United States as "America".

It's the same as Football and Soccer.  USA makes a lot more sense for an abrievation, but when someone who calls soccer football complains about it... i can't help but laugh because it's really ironic.

It's like when an adulterer gets angry when they find out their mistress has cheated on them.

 

First you made a fallacy of analogy(if its called like this in english I dont know), a sports name isnt the same as countries.

Second, the case for America is tthat its a continent, and just one country in that continent calls themselves america, the rest call themselves by their own names. On football, there are many sports, and each of them calls themselves football(USA people call  AF football, and the rest f the world calls AssF football too), in this case, its just that more people play AssF and call it football, soccer is what USA citizens call it so I dont see the abreviation they made is a more correct term.

They are exactly the same.

Except there is no continent called america.  There are two contents that have America in their name.  North America and South America.  However their is no actual "American" continent.

Your arguement in regards to soccer is "more people call their own shit by the wrong name so it's ok."

Which is... well insane logic right there.

There is class, and there are subclasses in that class.

By referring to a subclass as a class you are making an error no matter what your justification for it may be.

America is a continent. There is no country named america, when you reffer as americans you refer to people that live in the american continent.

Soccer is not the correct name, its an abreviation used only in US. I said people that call it football make a mistake too since its association football, I just said that since more people play this its the only football that matters so when reffering to football people think of association football, not that its correct and its name is just football.

And by no means its the same thing, its a stupid analogy.

Actually Soccer is used in other places too... and was created by England.

Additionally America is NOT a continent.  If you think it is you had a bad Geography teacher.

Actually, when Im in the Spanish wikipedia its says its one continent thats divided into 3 subdivisions because its too big, in the english though it says they are 2 americas. Ill go with the spanish version :P



Ok. Just know that the Spanish version is wrong and not accepted scientifically when it comes to geography.



Kasz216 said:
Ok. Just know that the Spanish version is wrong and not accepted scientifically.


Id like to know why then.



pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
Ok. Just know that the Spanish version is wrong and not accepted scientifically.


Id like to know why then.

Well

A) It's not the accepted model by the international scientific community. (The big one.)

B) North and South America broke apart at different times, from different places.

C) The only connection between the two continents of North and South America is the Isthmus of Panma.

D) North America and South America each have their own Continental Cores.

E) They both have their own Tectonic Plates.

 

Europe being combined with Asia has more bearing then the two America's being combined ever would.



Kasz216 said:
pastro243 said:
Kasz216 said:
Ok. Just know that the Spanish version is wrong and not accepted scientifically.


Id like to know why then.

Well

A) It's not the accepted model by the international scientific community. (The big one.)

B) North and South America broke apart at different times, from different places.

C) The only connection between the two continents of North and South America is the Isthmus of Panma.

D) North America and South America each have their own Continental Cores.

E) They both have their own Tectonic Plates.

 

Europe being combined with Asia has more bearing then the two America's being combined ever would.

Ok, I understand that, but the way we call the continent isnt given by the way they formed, not speaking from a scientific point of view is actually a continent because of the way they found it. In english they call it the americas because  british called people in their colonies in the continent as americans, so its thier americans and the other americans(latin americans and others).

Even if they could be the same continent europe and asia will be europe and asia no matter what tectonic plates indicate, because this is a cultural or historic thing more than scientific when we are speaking oif something like how we call a country.