I think the problem is in the word "invent".  English is more of an evolution of previous languages, so it is more like the English were the first to use it.

Yes it's an evolution of different languages foreign and regional but to simplify it as the first to use it is nonsense.

How could we be the first to use it if it didn't exist. It was created by the English using what was around and standardised over time to form what we use today.

It was created on English shores hence the name of the Language is English. Someone didn't spot it sticking out of the ground when out looking for buried Saxon gold and decided to use it.

Most languages are formed the same way but no-one nit picks over them like they do with English.

What I am saying is that the English people didn't just suddenly invent English like the wheel was invented.  It wasn't like some guy said "now we are going to call this a 'house' as opposed to what we were calling it yesterday".  People just talked to each other, and as time went on the languages changed.  That is how the U.K. was eventually speaking English.

You know what language is difficult? Latin.

Oh. My. God.

There are like 130 (!?) different forms of one verb, 12 different forms of ONE noun, a handful of exceptions, and too many different conjugations and noun declensions (a declension being all the different forms of one noun).

Ugh...

Latin can get away with it though because it's amazing

It's one of the original languages, besides grunts and moans of course.

Latin...oh the days of 8th grade lol.

It is suspected that Vulgar Latin(the Latin that formed all romance languages and wasn't reconstructed), is actually much easier than Classical Latin, which is reconstructed btw. From what I can tell, most of the latin in writing is classical, while spoken latin is vulgar. That is because during those times, the literacy rate was obviously not up to par, and it was the minority educated patricians who were able to read and write. The majority of the people(Plebians) only spoke it, and when spoken it was in the form of vulgar latin. Latin is probably in the middle in terms of difficulty for a Native Speaker. I've been looking at Basque a lot lately, and it seems to be difficult for me due to it not being Indo-European. So a lot of things that you would assume to be 1:1  aren't. I've also been learning Japanese for a year, and while it is 1:1 I expected it not to be, so I'm progressing easily. Plus it has very simple grammer. Aparently some people boast Navajo as the hardest language to learn as a non-native. I would say the hardest languages for somebody coming from a European one, would definately be those of Amerindians. So Navajo might not be too off.

Still invented by the English. Whether intentionally or not. Suddenly or over time. Lots of things have been invented those ways we don't dispute that just who the inventor was.

Do you say the same thing when someone says the Spanish invented Spanish?
There was a need to sit down and invent a standard Language in England due to each area having it's own dialect and even language so people all over the country could trade and travel so in that regards and well every other the English invented English.

I think you're being deliberately pedantic and nit picking and it doesn't aplly here.

Let me ask you. Are animals invented? Did the ancestor of humans invent them? No. English is always evolving, and therefore never "invented". Actually, you can arguing that a lot of the English citizens can't claim to have been with the language from the begginning because many have Celtic, or some other Non-Anglo Saxon ancestry. Even then, if the language really was invented, it wasn't invented by the current generation, so you can never really take dominance as it being more "correct".

HAHAHA wtf is the 2nd one l,ao

it sounds like he is saying aluminous but with um insted os ous