Uncharted 1 got a 9.1

So adding a deep and addictive multiplayer, upgrading the graphics big time, fixing all the glitches and minor issues, making a longer campaign and better story, is only enough to get .4 better for U2?

Excuse me, but WTF is this?

It only gets .1 better score than BlazBlue?? (no disrespect to BlazBlu).

It only get's .2 more than InFamous???? InFamous is a great game, but I've gotten more replay value out of the Uncharted 2 DEMO than I got out of the entire InFamous game!!

I cant help but think a 360 fanboy wrote this review and regardless of how good the game is, was thinking "well we can't have this getting a better score than gears of war, so we'll just give it a 9.5 and call them even"

9.5 is a great score.

Your stay on this site seems to becoming dime...

Resistance also got a 9.5


I'm sorry, but Uncharted 2 is much better than Resistance 2.


I'm absolutely baffled by this score from IGN.


How did MGS4 get a 10/10, and what makes Uncharted 2 get less of a score?

Are you high? That's a great score.

You are not satisfied with 9.5??

WTF??? 9.5 is freakin high!!! and I'm happy to see Uncharted 2 getting these numbers.

I know, a 9.5/10 is such a terrible score.

Going by your name, I'm not going to even read you reasoning. Leave IGN alone, they are professionals.

So should all games be clumped together at the 9.5 mark, with nothing ever exceeding it? 

Halo3, Gears, Killzone, Resistance2, etc. Why must everything get clumped together as a 9.5

Use Resistance 2 as an example: Uncharted 2 has far better graphics, better multiplayer (yes, it's much better), Cinema mode, Machinima Mode, more co-op modes, better story, etc.

Why give them the same score