By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - IGN: Uncharted 2 Review

Cougarman on 18 September 2009

i knew this game would get great scores, day 1 purchase here



Wii/Mario Kart Wii Code:2793-0686-5434
Around the Network
iron_megalith on 18 September 2009

YEAHHHHHHHHHHHH! I'll buy 3 copies pls! ;)



MrNathanDrake on 18 September 2009

My problem is the score is not consistent with what he's actually saying about the game



"it's easily one of the best titles of this console generation."

"To say that the multiplayer is fun would be a massive understatement. For my money, this is one of the best multiplayer experiences that you'll find in any game around, and considering that the single-player portion alone is enough to easily warrant your $60, well, this almost feels like Naughty Dog has given us an extra game for free."

"If you're reading this, it was unlikely that you weren't already going to buy Uncharted 2: Among Thieves on day one. Really, you just wanted to know how good it is, and fortunately I can say that it's very, very good. It's easily one of the best games on the system, blending fantastic presentation and visuals with gameplay that is practically second to none. And then there's the stellar multiplayer which you'll probably be playing until Uncharted 3 ships. No, Uncharted 2 is not perfect, but it's closer than pretty much any other game out there these days."



MrNathanDrake on 18 September 2009

It's easily one of the best titles of this console generation!!!!


Yet it only deserved a 9.5????


Well if it's one of the best, shouldnt its score reflect that it's better than the slew of games rated 9.5??



twesterm on 18 September 2009

-edit-

nevermind



 

Around the Network
MAFKKA on 18 September 2009

*Spamming backspace screaming "NO SPOILERS AAAH NANANANA" Can't hear ya"....*



TheThunder on 18 September 2009

IGN gave Resistance 2 9.5 as well.

Just sayin.



XxXProphecyXxX on 18 September 2009

^^And it was a gr8 game.=)



snyperdud on 18 September 2009
TheThunder said:
IGN gave Resistance 2 9.5 as well.

Just sayin.

And that game deserved it.

 

OT: Great score.

It's a first day buy whether it got a good score or not but, this is pretty awesome.



Add me on Steam

Zones on 18 September 2009
darthdevidem01 said:
Zones said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Zones said:
darthdevidem01 said:
you know FOR 2 MIN I THOUGHT the Drake was ELENA's father was actually a joke

but I saw the video review & OMG....how can this be!

 

Wow!

You couldn't take a fucking second to put a spoiler tag, really?.

Just know, you are the worst fucking person on VGChartz with all THESE CAPS for the pointless VG$ you try to make, I don't care if I get banned for this, but I am sure many other agree with me here on this.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

1. As they make VG$ (which you admit)..... people post in them

2. As people post in them........they are not pointless, otherwise why would people post in them?

People want such threads.....they find them interesting/controversial, they post in them....so I make them.

Thats like saying prostitutes are the worst people on this planet, but on the other hand what about the people who GO TO THEM......there are prostitutes present because people are willing to go to them

In the same way there are threads with CAPS that earn VG$ because they have content that makes people post in them......simple as that, if you think I'm the worst, then so are the VGc posters who post in them that earn me those VG$ (which btw are useless)

You have disgraced yourself btw, as it was a joke

 

I still think you are, in a way, ruining the board by posting misleading topics and trying to make big deals out of everything and I think that's the only reason why people are interested in your topics. I don't think your analogy of prostitute really works here as they are completely unrelated.

I think I have to agree with you on one thing though; me disgracing myself. But exactly, how would I know it was a joke?

 

Misleading thread titles......I write thread titles that make sense to me at the time and or what the article that is in my thread is saying. I over-exaggerate in thread titles, but the content inside them is there for people to see & then make their own opinion out of.

As for making a big deal out of everything, I think you just did that more than I have ever done in any of my threads, ever.

If my threads are ruining the board as you say I would be perma banned by now.

The analogy of prostitute works, if people want to post in a thread that according to them is misleading/making a big deal, its their own fault for posting in them & giving such threads more exposure, I am not forcefully making any vg chartz member post in my threads. If my threads that are supposedly misleading earn VG$ by posts....blame the people who post in them, not me.

And how would you know it was a joke? use common sense, can Drake really be Elena's father...no.

________

Calling a Vg Chartz member the worst f***** person on the site & overreacting so much tells me I don't really need to apologize to you. (not that I had done anything wrong to begin with)

I did make a big deal out of literally nothing here, I agree with you on that, but again, that's not exactly related to your topics. And I will try not to continue this conversion here after this post since this topic is about IGN's review on Uncharted 2 and it's not in any way related to your topics.

I don't think you have done anything against the rules to warrant a ban, or perma-ban here; you are just making way too many topics out of everything you probably see, and you do anything to make them look interesting in order to lure people in. I am not saying your topics content are misleading, I am basically saying you make way too many topics (probably for VG$), and most of them with misleading titles by over-exaggerating or using caps or thing like that.

Oh, and common sense made me think Uncharted: Drakes Fortune would never have anything unrealistic like monsters. But yeah now that I think of the spoiler, it's pretty stupid, and I wouldn't post my first comment if it wasn't for Kantor confirming it, but it was my bad for thinking it was true, not him or yours.

Anyway, I do apologise for calling you that, and I think it's pointless to continue this discussion anymore here.