Reasonable said:
WessleWoggle said: @Reasonable
You see, I do not experience satisfaction from creating my own levels in things. I do however experience satisfaction from winning a good battle, gun to gun.
Off topic... I'm getting really sick of people bringing up the fact that what I say is subjective. I swear, every point of conjecture I make, there's someone saying "that's subjective blah blah blah" I never claim objectivity! |
Best to stick to 'I prefer' vs 'is more satisfying' type statements then. I like this site because it tends to always call people out on subjective vs factual comments.
I can perfectly understand you find something like Halo 3 more satisfying than LBP, and wouldn't try and convince you otherwise. However I can also understand, because it's true for me too, someone finding LBP more satisfying.
Satisfation, enjoyment, etc. are all subjective preferences.
|
True, but I think you're forgetting my actual wording. I did use "I prefer" statements!
"While little big planet is entertaining, it's not the kind of game I would buy or play all the time if I had a Ps3. Battling on Halo 3 brings me much more satisfaction."
I said "me". I never said it was true for anyone else!
"LBP is far more entertaining, Halo 3 and most other shooting games have the satisfaction of the kill."
I said "the satisfaction of the kill". Never said it was a greater satisfaction, just a different kind, that I personally prefer. I even agree that LBP is more entertaining - to me entertainment has to do with the length you can play something. LBP would keep me entertained for longer amount of time. Halo 3 is very satisfying when I'm in the mood, but after and hour or two it gets boring. LBP doesn't get as boring.