By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Call of Duty 4 developed for each console separately

Sorrow880 on 13 October 2007

I wasn't sure which console I was going to get Call of Duty 4 on (either 360 or ps3)...I guess from the sounds of this article, I'll probably be getting it on the ps3 now. I'm glad they are developing it individually on each console rather than just porting it from one to the other.

http://www.dailygame.net/news/archives/006696.php   (towards end of article)

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=21738

Well regardless of which console I get it on...this game is looking beautiful...can't wait.



Well, I now only have access to a PS3 & 360...Plan on buying a wii soon (lol, if I can ever find one available!) but will probably wait until some of the major RPG's come out like Dragon Quest & Tales, etc.

Anyhow, I'm so far behind in games to play that I'm not in a huge hurry (lol, haven't even gotten a chance to finish God of War II yet!) 

Around the Network
darthdevidem on 13 October 2007

DEFINITELY PS3 version (not that I have a choice..lol)

but even for 360 AND PS3 owners, it should be ps3, if these reports are correct



Supporter of

 SONY & Nintendo

 Consoles owned - SNES, N64, PS, GC, PS2, PSP, PS3

 I DO NOT support Xbox

My prediction for YEARS END:

WII - 18.3 Million

Xbox 360 - 15 Million

Playstation 3 - 8.5 Million

WEWdeadeye on 13 October 2007

360 controls for COD4 > PS3. I was in the beta for that game, there is no way I would want to get it on the PS3 now.



Currently Playing:

PS4 - Killzone:SF and Assasins Creed 4

 

XBox One: BF4, CoD:Ghosts, Dead Rising 3, Forza 5

 

Changing channels with my voice: priceless!!!

craighopkins on 13 October 2007

360 version has rumble



jammy2211 on 13 October 2007

I don't believe they chose to spend $45 million+ developing two versions, instead of spending $25 million on making one and porting it.

Sounds like some 'twisted' truths to me.



Around the Network
darthdevidem on 13 October 2007

@WEWDeadeye

WOW, please tell me where you got to play the PS3 version to be able t compare controls!

{note sarcasm}

@craighopkins

So does the PS3 version....



Supporter of

 SONY & Nintendo

 Consoles owned - SNES, N64, PS, GC, PS2, PSP, PS3

 I DO NOT support Xbox

My prediction for YEARS END:

WII - 18.3 Million

Xbox 360 - 15 Million

Playstation 3 - 8.5 Million

craighopkins on 13 October 2007
darthdevidem said:


@craighopkins

So does the PS3 version....

hmm maybe Ill get the PS3 version

WHen do the rumble controllers come out?



GranTurismo on 13 October 2007
jammy2211 said:
I don't believe they chose to spend $45 million+ developing two versions, instead of spending $25 million on making one and porting it.

Sounds like some 'twisted' truths to me.

 Where does it say they spent 45mil to make the game?



GranTurismo on 13 October 2007
craighopkins said:
darthdevidem said:


@craighopkins

So does the PS3 version....

hmm maybe Ill get the PS3 version

WHen do the rumble controllers come out?


 You can buy them on the net this year, if you live n NA/europe you must wait to next year to buy them at the store.



jammy2211 on 13 October 2007
GranTurismo said:
jammy2211 said:
I don't believe they chose to spend $45 million+ developing two versions, instead of spending $25 million on making one and porting it.

Sounds like some 'twisted' truths to me.

Where does it say they spent 45mil to make the game?


  To be honest I can't even make out what the article is trying to say, the topic title suggests the developer chose to make two seperate games entirely.

  I was merely using the statistic that as a PS3 / 360 game costs $20 million+ to develope they would have chosen to spend alot of extra money to make the same game, which doesn't add up to me :/.