By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Japanese election upends long-ruling party

TOKYO – Japan's ruling party conceded a crushing defeat Sunday after 54 years of nearly unbroken rule as voters were poised to hand the opposition a landslide victory in nationwide elections, driven by economic anxiety and a powerful desire for change.

The left-of-center Democratic Party of Japan was set to win 300 or more of the 480 seats in the lower house of parliament, ousting theLiberal Democrats, who have governed Japan for all but 11 months since 1955, according to exit polls by all major Japanese TV networks.

"These results are very severe," Prime Minister Taro Aso said in a news conference at party headquarters, conceding his party was headed for a big loss. "There has been a deep dissatisfaction with our party."

Aso said he would have to accept responsibility for the results, suggesting that he would resign as party president. Other LDP leaders also said they would step down, though official results were not to be released until early Monday morning.

The loss by the Liberal Democrats — traditionally a pro-business, conservative party — would open the way for the Democratic Party, headed by Yukio Hatoyama, to replace Aso and establish a new Cabinet, possibly within the next few weeks.

The vote was seen as a barometer of frustrations over Japan's worsteconomic slump since World War II and a loss of confidence in the ruling Liberal Democrats' ability to tackle tough problems such as the rising national debt and rapidly aging population.

The Democrats have embraced a more populist platform, promising handouts for families with children and farmers, a higher minimum wage, and to rebuild the economy.

"The nation is very angry with the ruling party, and we are grateful for their deep support," Hatoyama said after the polls closed. "We will not be arrogant and we will listen to the people."

The Democrats have also said they will seek a more independent relationship with Washington, while forging closer ties with Japan's Asian neighbors, including China. But Hatoyama, who holds a doctorate in engineering from Stanford University, insists he will not seek dramatic change in Japan's foreign policy, saying the U.S.-Japan alliance would "continue to be the cornerstone of Japanese diplomatic policy."

National broadcaster NHK, using projections based on exit polls of roughly 400,000 voters, said the Democratic Party was set to win 300 seats and the Liberal Democrats only about 100 — a third of its strength before the vote.

TV Asahi, another major network, said the Democratic Party would win 315 seats, up from the 112 seats it held before parliament was dissolved in July.

As voting closed Sunday night, officials said turnout was high, despite an approaching typhoon, indicating the intense level of public interest in the hotly contested campaigns.

Even before the vote was over, the Democrats pounded the ruling party for driving the country into a ditch.

Japan's unemployment has spiked to record 5.7 percent while deflation has intensified and families have cut spending because they are insecure about the future.

Making the situation more dire is Japan's aging demographic — which means more people are on pensions and there is a shrinking pool of taxpayers to support them and other government programs.

Many voters said that although the Democrats are largely untested in power and doubts remain about whether they will be able to deliver on their promises, the country needs a change.

"We don't know if the Democrats can really make a difference, but we want to give them a chance," Junko Shinoda, 59, a government employee, said after voting at a crowded polling center in downtown Tokyo.

The Democratic Party would only need to win a simple majority of 241 seats in the lower house to assure that it can name the next prime minister. The 300-plus level would allow it and its two smaller allies the two-thirds majority they need in the lower house to pass bills.

Having the Democrats in power would smooth policy debates in parliament, which has been deadlocked since the Democrats and their allies took over the less powerful upper house in 2007.

To ease parenting costs and encourage more women to have babies, the Democrats propose giving families 26,000 yen ($275) a month per child through junior high. Japan's population of 127.6 millionpeaked in 2006, and is expected to decline to 115 million in 2030 and fall below 100 million by the middle of the century.

The party is also proposing toll-free highways, free high schools, income support for farmers, monthly allowances for job seekers in training, a higher minimum wage and tax cuts. The estimated bill comes to 16.8 trillion yen ($179 billion) if fully implemented starting in fiscal year 2013 — and critics say the plans would further bloat Japan's massive public debt.

The Democrats will likely face resistance from Japan's powerful bureaucrats, who favor the status quo and hold a great deal of influence in shaping policy.

Aso — whose own support ratings have sagged to a dismal 20 percent — repeatedly stressed his party led Japan's rise from the ashes of World War II into one of the world's biggest economic powers and are best equipped to get it out of its current morass.

In the end, voter worries about the economy and disenchantment with the LDP's long grip on power proved too much to overcome.

"It's revolutionary," said Tomoaki Iwai, a political science professor at Tokyo's Nihon University. "It's the first real change of government" Japan has had in six decades.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090830/ap_on_re_as/as_japan_politics;_ylt=Agh0x6Z7UwA1R.bbpL7QeH50fNdF

 



Around the Network

No surprise here. I mean it had historic turnout.

Historic turnout means the party in power is screwed.

 

Also... the Democrats are more liberal then the Liberal Democrats.  I freakin hate political party names.



"The Liberal Democrats — traditionally a pro-business, conservative party"

Well, that is just so confusing.



 

 

I also like where they're promising 12 things including taxcuts.

Taxcuts should never be packaged with other free things.



That a huge amount of time for 1 party. Holy shampoo.



 

 

Around the Network

so wot will be the effect on console market..?



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_CQyU4ayBifw/SbbkzI5qEGI/AAAAAAAACGI/rV0NkYwYzlM/s1600-h/Debt.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_CQyU4ayBifw/Sgg-wm76M9I/AAAAAAAACNw/ocO8eIV1uA0/s1600-h/Age.jpg

To use a highly technical term to describe Japan, one could say that their economy is FUBAR'ed ...



Japan has some options:

1. Allow immigration, which would end up being a disaster.

2. Give government handouts for people who have more kids (also a bad idea).

3. Make their buildings increasingly efficient. Apartments stretch upwards for miles (if anyone can do it, they can).



 

 

MontanaHatchet said:
Japan has some options:

1. Allow immigration, which would end up being a disaster.

2. Give government handouts for people who have more kids (also a bad idea).

3. Make their buildings increasingly efficient. Apartments stretch upwards for miles (if anyone can do it, they can).

30 years ago Japan could have encouraged greater immigration and/or provided incentives for people to have children at a rate to maintain the population while focusing on producing highly dense cities to sustain the massive population of Japan in such a tiny space; but it is already too late for them to do anything about it ...

To maintain the quality of living in Japan they needed an steady stream of people entering into the economy (and becoming productive at a rate that people were leaving the economy) about a decade ago. Currently they're hitting a crisis point and any action they take will likely result in productive people entering into the economy a decade (or more) from now.

 

If Japan cuts taxes while increasing spending to buy a couple more years they're only going to make matters worse in the long run. What I'm waiting to see is what happens to the young people in Japan when they realize that they're expected to fully support multiple generations of people who didn't have the foresight to plan for their retirement. I personally wouldn't be surprised to see a large portion of people under the age of 40 flee Japan to try to have some level of prosperity for themselves.



With Japanese government debt over 180% of GDP, how are they going to afford more social programs from a left-leaning government?

That's not to say that the status quo should have been kept. I hope that this political shift benefits the Japanese and helps them cope with their...Significant..Problems.

Japan could always start building arcologies, and putting their people in them.

http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/08/25/ziggurat-dubai-carbon-neutral-pyramid-will-house-1-million/

2.3sq/km = 1 million people. Build about 10 of 'em, and you fix most of Japan's woes.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.