leo-j,don't worry nobody will call you a fanboy.If they do ,just get them banned for name calling then

You do realise that value is:

1) Subjective

2) Inclusive of price in determining.

Whether it's people finding greater value out of the cheaper 360, or found less value in the more expensive PS3 (uptil now), it still equates to the 360 being in the lead and it being better value for more people.

Value would also include the 360 launching earlier (btw), because people found value in being able to play HD games now, then having to wait a year later.

If we talk about purely value for money and what consumers believe, the 360 is greater the PS3 (by virtue of more sales) and the Wii is definitely better than both of them.

Overall value for the price means nothing to people who don't use blu ray or don't have wireless internet (as examples). Just because you value them (and I do as well), doesn't necessarily mean that they provide everyone with better value for their money (which is probably why they bought the 360 instead, or vice versa).

So no, your opinion is not fact and doesn't apply to everybody.

Also, you should probably provide a link to who said it and where you found it.