Gawd, THANK you Star, pfft... "My opinion means Nothing" doesn't that count as flaming...?

Whats really ironic is game review = reviewers opinion.

But you can't have your own opinion, obviously because reviewers > everyone else.

I actually thought this was the official thread...

Well, in official thread any review score would be welcome...

And just to be thorough here are the negatives and positives

+If you love FF characters you will be in amazement as you watch characters from all over the FF universe to battle.

-The speed of the action and the top-notch presentation is almost enough to make you forget the game isn't good.

-Basic combat mechanics are unsatisfying. Erratic camera, shallow mechanics, and unreliable commands for performing specific attacks make implementing strategy difficult.

-Unlocking cool stuff involves grinding through the repetitive story mode.

-Multi-player only works locally.

"Dissidia is only valuable to gamers who can look past massive flaws and appreciate being immersed in the lore of the series."

This one isn't my official thread of Dissidia, if it was i wouldn't of said anything against it, the official one is here.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=49521

So if thats the case then my apoligies, i thought you were trying to mess with my good nature. :/

Regarding the review scores - when I was much younger I used to read Edge (mid-late nineties), and even though it was a real quality mag, their review section (and scores themselves) was attrocious. They slated some of the games we now consider classics - Nights, Thunder Force, and many others.

Whan it comes to gaming, reviews can be helpuful, but it's perhaps for the best if one does his (her) own research.

And btw three of my favorite games this gen are Too human, PDZ, and Earth Defense 2017. All were given not so great reviews by GI

"Dissidia is only valuable to gamers who can look past massive flaws and appreciate being immersed in the lore of the series."

6.5?!  No!!!