Alan Wake doesnt even look better than BioShock, which came out in 2007
Uncharted 2 is way above the competition
Alan Wake doesnt even look better than BioShock, which came out in 2007
Uncharted 2 is way above the competition
Typical vgchartz fanboys:
1. Sony fanboys- hyping games - CHECK
2. MS fanboys - just bitch about Sony stuff - CHECK
3. PC fanboys - Why doesn't anyone talk about us? - CHECK
4. Nintendo Fanboys - Have you looked at the sales lately - CRAP!
Can we get a little help here? Then we'd have the perfect thread!
Owner of PS4 Pro, Xbox One, Switch, PS Vita, and 3DS
The game looks great. The only other game this year that could give it a run for it's money (graphically) is Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time.
Both look amazing.
| SlumsofOhio said: Didn't Alan Wake show up on "E3's most disappointing games" from several websites? Even if the game looks good it will probably score in the low 80's anyways. |
No, it actually won some awards. Go and check IGN, they were totally enthusiastic.
I know you won't do it anyway, but just read this.
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/100/1001162p1.html
It won "Best Action Game" at E3 by IGN (Uncharted was a nominee)
http://uk.games.ign.com/articles/987/987759p1.html
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
You know had the title been 'Uncharted 2 looks really really really great' there wouldn't have been such a thread?
I only posted Crysis to remind people that the graphics king released in 2007 about the same time or before Uncharted 1.
Tease.
It goes without saying that I was talking about Consoles.
LOL@anyone who posts PC/Crysis shots. That's desperate.
CGI-Quality said:
"Graphics King" on PC, of course. The OP should have specified console, and your Crysis pics at that point, would have been useless. |
The title was inflamitory. It invited everyone who disagreed to come in here and do so.
'Bullshots'
'No this one looks better, see?'
If the OP wanted a reasonable expectation that the thread would not be derailed then something like my suggestion above would have been better.
But of course the idea that hyperbole should be toned down is lost on some people...
Crysis is never irrelevant when someone says 'graphics king', the only way it would have been is if the OP had used a different non inflamitory title.
Tease.
DirtyP2002 said:
I know you won't do it anyway, but just read this. http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/100/1001162p1.html It won "Best Action Game" at E3 by IGN (Uncharted was a nominee) |

| libellule said: well, Forza3 (plastic car powa) has already to beat GT5 prologue before entering in the competition (see eurogamer E3 preview) ... perhaps, after, we will compare it to Dirt and NFS |
Of course Eurogamer is entitled to thier opinion. As they are the media to think that.
Major LOL.

CGI-Quality said:
Don't you mean Forza 3 vs GT5: Prologue. And lol @ anyone who sees a major difference..... |
Heya CGI. The entire middle section is non existant in GT5P ( which is what Eurogamer reffered to, hence the comparison pic here ) Also the actual real life mountains visible at the track aren't there in GT5P. Another note is the texture detail is much better in the Forza 3 screenshot. The point was to show Eurogamer had to of been paid to say that comment. Comparing actual gameplay side by side in video is even more embarrising for GT5P.