Well, what if the enemy of your enemy still wants to destroy you? Maybe they're trying to kill you first!

dtewi said: SamuelRSmith said: dtewi said: SamuelRSmith said: Well, you've successfully broken into page 2. Anyways, gimme 5 and I'll redo that test for you guys. Unlike your super amazing internet connection alowing 100 posts, I have page 3. Anyway, it isn't as monumentally awesome as my Millionth Post thread. OT: So, what did everybody think of the economic inevitabilty of globilisation serving humnaity? Ah, the joys of living in a fairly densely populated MEDC. As for that question, I think it's fairly obvious that it should be to serve humanity, rather than MNCs - people would have their differences in whether they believe that helping MNCs actually helps humanity in the end. Let's go to a more interesting question. I would never always support my country.

This one all depends on whether we're talking on a national or international level. I won't support my Government out of blind faith when it comes to setting policies just because it's my Government, but when it comes to sporting events, etc, I will always support the UK, or any of its teams in the events (yes, I will even support the Scottish).

As for the UK's stance on international affairs, I don't know. Fortunately, the views of my Government (pro democracy, human rights, etc) are very similar to my views, and so I will side with it naturally, anyway. I haven't been interested in politics, or been in the know, long enough, to have a case where my patriotism collides with my beliefs.

Where are your results, Sammy?

I edited my post above with the results.

View post: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=2402737

Off-Topic: We're close to two and a half-million posts. Cool.

Q1:
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

Strongly agree. I view the increase of power of global corporations as a threat to democracy. These corporations can use the economic advantages their business provides to muscle democratic governments into unfavorable policies, and can choose the most leniant government as the location for future business.

Q2:
I'd always support my country, whether it was right or wrong.

Strongly Disagree. I only support my country when I think it is right, or perhaps if it is doing something I dont think is right because of public opinion and democracy.

Q3:
No one chooses his or her country of birth, so it's foolish to be proud of it.

Disagree. I'm proud of my country and family.

Q4:
Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.

Strongly Disagree. I feel thinking otherwise would be racist.

Q5:
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Disagree. The enemy of your enemy can still be your enemy.

For Political Compass....

Q1: If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

 True

Q2:

I'd always support my country, whether it was right or wrong.

 No, i have the freedom to choose what's right or wrong.

Q3:

No one chooses his or her country of birth, so it's foolish to be proud of it.

Disagree, I am like my parents and have similar views to them and they migrated to the US(or one did)

Q4:

Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.

Yes, By 2050 there will be more hispanics(both white and nomral) than European Caucasians

Q5: The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Yes. If they reach for the same goal, support them

The superior quality being the ability to have more babies?

I'd guess the superior quality of having less babies.  Sounds pretty white to me.  Looks that way too if his avatar is his picture.

People should really read Outliers.  It gives a good ideas on many of the surprising ways people become successful.