By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - What is your political party

dtewi said:
fmc83 said:
This thread really became one of the most interesting ones on here for me.
The second test was way better then the first, but still there were many things not clear enough for me.
The strangest question was something like:

Should companies that mislead costumers be punished?

I strongly agreed, because I had an extreme case in mind: The Contergan-case, which caused heavily misbuild children, because the pharma-company didn't research enough and therefore misleaded the public.

If I had a case in mind like: company A builds yoghurt packings which look like 300g are in them, but there are just 250g in them, I would heavily disagree, because the costumer should be smart enough to look at the packages to see the differences.

Would be interesting, to discuss the questions one by one, to see what others implied, when they read them.

Someone interested???

Discussing the questions would probably spark over dozens of debates and lead to this thread having about 600 pages.

 



Around the Network
FootballFan said:
dtewi said:
fmc83 said:
This thread really became one of the most interesting ones on here for me.
The second test was way better then the first, but still there were many things not clear enough for me.
The strangest question was something like:

Should companies that mislead costumers be punished?

I strongly agreed, because I had an extreme case in mind: The Contergan-case, which caused heavily misbuild children, because the pharma-company didn't research enough and therefore misleaded the public.

If I had a case in mind like: company A builds yoghurt packings which look like 300g are in them, but there are just 250g in them, I would heavily disagree, because the costumer should be smart enough to look at the packages to see the differences.

Would be interesting, to discuss the questions one by one, to see what others implied, when they read them.

Someone interested???

Discussing the questions would probably spark over dozens of debates and lead to this thread having about 600 pages.

 

That would give me a lot of money.

Yeah. Let's do it.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

we could do it more like:
We start with question 1-5 and everybody interested states, if there were some specific cases he had in mind, when he went for the one or the other direction. Off course, you can't remember everything, but it would be really interesting what led to some personal decisions.

Discussions wouldn't be so mandatory, as it's just interesting to see, what everybody had in mind.



fmc83 said:
we could do it more like:
We start with question 1-5 and everybody interested states, if there were some specific cases he had in mind, when he went for the one or the other direction. Off course, you can't remember everything, but it would be really interesting what led to some personal decisions.

Discussions wouldn't be so mandatory, as it's just interesting to see, what everybody had in mind.

Why do the rules have to be that rigid?

Post whatever the hell you feel about the test.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Well, you've successfully broken into page 2.

Anyways, gimme 5 and I'll redo that test for you guys.

EDIT: Here ya go:

Pretty much where I always end up, sometimes just a tad more left, sometimes just a tad more south.

EDIT2: I'm pushed north-wise because of my support of CCTV and compulsory education



Around the Network
dtewi said:

Why do the rules have to be that rigid?

Post whatever the hell you feel about the test.

Lol, looks like the test failed me, when I'm for rigid rules like that^^

No, it was just a suggestion to keep things simple and you're still able to overlook the thread, but actually I don't care if somebody wants to post about anything: go for it



SamuelRSmith said:
Well, you've successfully broken into page 2.

Anyways, gimme 5 and I'll redo that test for you guys.

Unlike your super amazing internet connection alowing 100 posts, I have page 3.

Anyway, it isn't as monumentally awesome as my Millionth Post thread.

OT: So, what did everybody think of the economic inevitabilty of globilisation serving humnaity?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

dtewi said:
SamuelRSmith said:
Well, you've successfully broken into page 2.

Anyways, gimme 5 and I'll redo that test for you guys.

Unlike your super amazing internet connection alowing 100 posts, I have page 3.

Anyway, it isn't as monumentally awesome as my Millionth Post thread.

OT: So, what did everybody think of the economic inevitabilty of globilisation serving humnaity?

Ah, the joys of living in a fairly densely populated MEDC.

As for that question, I think it's fairly obvious that it should be to serve humanity, rather than MNCs - people would have their differences in whether they believe that helping MNCs actually helps humanity in the end.



Q1:
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

I voted for strongly agree, because I'm convinced, that if trans-national corporations are becoming too big, that this will do harm to humanity. So it's not a good thing if globaliztions just happens in favour of t-n-corps. Again it's alright, if globalization helps the economy, but not t-n-corparations to become to big

Q2:
I'd always support my country, whether it was right or wrong.

Disagree, because I believe that to critize is an important part of democracy, which shouldn't be stopped by blind patriotism.

Q3:
No one chooses his or her country of birth, so it's foolish to be proud of it.

Agree. This was a question I would've answered between agree and disagree, because while sometimes it's foolish it's on the other hand not bad to be proud of your roots.

Q4:
Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.

Strongly disagree, because I don't believe in the race-concept.

Q5:
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Disagree. If the enemy is even a bigger bastard it won't help you to support him, but create even bigger problems. But sometimes it would be the right thing to support your enemy's enemy, but definitely not always. See Iraq-Iran, USSR-Afghanistan conflict.



SamuelRSmith said:
dtewi said:
SamuelRSmith said:
Well, you've successfully broken into page 2.

Anyways, gimme 5 and I'll redo that test for you guys.

Unlike your super amazing internet connection alowing 100 posts, I have page 3.

Anyway, it isn't as monumentally awesome as my Millionth Post thread.

OT: So, what did everybody think of the economic inevitabilty of globilisation serving humnaity?

Ah, the joys of living in a fairly densely populated MEDC.

As for that question, I think it's fairly obvious that it should be to serve humanity, rather than MNCs - people would have their differences in whether they believe that helping MNCs actually helps humanity in the end.


Let's go to a more interesting question.

I would never always support my country.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you