famousringo said:
TheRealMafoo said:
pastro243 said:
MrBubbles said: it is there to protect everyones freedom. to prevent another dictator coming to power.
|
Its more like its there to put a militar dictator in power.
I dont know how that protects liberty since anyway the ones who choose the president are still the people.
|
And in October/November, they get to chose another one.
|
Anybody except the guy they've already had. And if they talk about how they'd like to re-elect that guy, they're summarily arrested by the army without so much as the need for a court ruling. I thought somebody as obsessed with freedom as you would condemn this kind of tyranny.
Does that sound like a democracy to you? One of the defining characteristics of a democracy is that ultimate power flows from the people. It's clear that in Honduras, ultimate power flows from the army.
Legitimate democracies don't need to control the media. Dictators do.
|
So if I ask congress if it's ok that I don't pay taxes, they say no, and I don't pay them anyway and am arrested, that's tyranny?
There are proper ways to change the Constitution. I am for the rule of law, and even a president needs to follow those rules, whether he likes it or not.
And last I checked, the US has a FCC that controls the media. That does not make them less of a democracy.
If he wanted to change that law, he needed to petition congress to change it. That’s why they have a congress, so one man cannot change the constitution just because he wants to.
The Constitution is a document to protect the people of a country. Allowing one man to defy it against the will of the Supreme Court and congress is tyranny. Removing him from office is democracy.