By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - UK housing question....

Mistershine said:
Immigants! I knew it was them! Even when it was the bears, I knew it
was them.

Bra-fucking-vo!

You, sir, have made my day.



Around the Network

I am still floored that the UK has different minimum wadges for age groups. The only reason you set a minimum wage, is because you want to set a value on someones time. That there life is worth at least a minimum in value.

Why does the UK think its kids are less valuable then its adults?



SamuelRSmith said:
kowenicki said:
@samuel

my definition of an economic migrant doesnt have to be an immigrant.

My post wasn't in response to yours, but to the thread in general.

----

Anyway, can I now turn this into an anti-Thatcher rant? After all, it was her who sold off all the council houses and got us in this mess to start with. I personally think that we should be spending money now on building social housing and regenerating some areas that have become, well, in need of regeneration. It would also create a few thousand jobs, which would be good for the current situation.

agreed, if we had more housing, then there would be much less of an issue about how does or dosent get it, largely because more people will get it.



TheRealMafoo said:
I am still floored that the UK has different minimum wadges for age groups. The only reason you set a minimum wage, is because you want to set a value on someones time. That there life is worth at least a minimum in value.

Why does the UK think its kids are less valuable then its adults?

First of all, the minimum wage is set to make sure everybody gets a wage to live on. Kids have less things to worry about (mortgages, bills, etc), and so they don't need to have a minimum wage as high.

Secondly, the Government is doing as much as possible to make kids stay in education for as long as possible, by making the benefits of working lower, the person is more likely to go onto college/university.



TheRealMafoo said:
I am still floored that the UK has different minimum wadges for age groups. The only reason you set a minimum wage, is because you want to set a value on someones time. That there life is worth at least a minimum in value.

Why does the UK think its kids are less valuable then its adults?

i agree with you on that, i think it should be the same for all ages.



Around the Network
SamuelRSmith said:
TheRealMafoo said:
I am still floored that the UK has different minimum wadges for age groups. The only reason you set a minimum wage, is because you want to set a value on someones time. That there life is worth at least a minimum in value.

Why does the UK think its kids are less valuable then its adults?

First of all, the minimum wage is set to make sure everybody gets a wage to live on. Kids have less things to worry about (mortgages, bills, etc), and so they don't need to have a minimum wage as high.

Secondly, the Government is doing as much as possible to make kids stay in education for as long as possible, by making the benefits of working lower, the person is more likely to go onto college/university.

But in a time where adults need any job they can find, kids take the entire low end labor work force, because why hire an adults when you can get cheaper labor?

You say adults need more money to live on, yet you’re giving them less opportunity to earn it.



TheRealMafoo said:
SamuelRSmith said:
TheRealMafoo said:
I am still floored that the UK has different minimum wadges for age groups. The only reason you set a minimum wage, is because you want to set a value on someones time. That there life is worth at least a minimum in value.

Why does the UK think its kids are less valuable then its adults?

First of all, the minimum wage is set to make sure everybody gets a wage to live on. Kids have less things to worry about (mortgages, bills, etc), and so they don't need to have a minimum wage as high.

Secondly, the Government is doing as much as possible to make kids stay in education for as long as possible, by making the benefits of working lower, the person is more likely to go onto college/university.

But in a time where adults need any job they can find, kids take the entire low end labor work force, because why hire an adults when you can get cheaper labor?

You say adults need more money to live on, yet you’re giving them less opportunity to earn it.

Bearing in mind that the minimum wage legislation was set way before the recession (1997), and that the areas that kids usually field (shop workers), haven't been hit as hard by the recession as other areas (main sources of unemployment being financial and manufacturing).

However, I agree that during times of recession, the minimum wages should be brought closer together, and the adults perhaps even lowered slightly - as to help increase employment.



I am an immigrant in the UK myself but i think Social Housing (Council Housing) should give preference to citizens and residents of the country, especially in harsh realities of today.

Plus UK has a problem with illegal immigration.



im watching a news report on the housing issue now, it sounds like there was a report that found there was no bias, so because the media dont like that fact, the government has introduced a measure that essentialy allows local councils to discriminate against people, not only from other nations, but even outside of the local area. basically, its a terrible proposal, and the government deserves criticism for it.



Lolcislaw said:
I am an immigrant in the UK myself but i think Social Housing (Council Housing) should give preference to citizens and residents of the country, especially in harsh realities of today.

Plus UK has a problem with illegal immigration.


what?

you think you should be discriminated against, purely for being from another nation?