The U.S. is about 81.5 times the size of North Korea. North Korea has a couple nukes, the U.S. (from what I remember) has thousands. If they want a fight, they've got it.
Iran wouldn't use their nukes, they just want them so they can act tough.
The U.S. is about 81.5 times the size of North Korea. North Korea has a couple nukes, the U.S. (from what I remember) has thousands. If they want a fight, they've got it.
Iran wouldn't use their nukes, they just want them so they can act tough.
| MontanaHatchet said: The U.S. is about 81.5 times the size of North Korea. North Korea has a couple nukes, the U.S. (from what I remember) has thousands. If they want a fight, they've got it. |
Although I would back the U.S. soldiers. I really Hope it never comes to that for everyones sake.





I dont fear cuz my country doesnt have problems with almost anyone.
- Our album on spotify https://open.spotify.com/album/56mEbEgyBYGzcDyZ1eMQ1v?si=hYKgir5YRSCrzywgGmV4oQ
- Our videoclip
- My manga: https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/blanca-the-world/list?title_no=313068
No
Remember it was the US that invented, tested and actually used nukes twice. No one else has used them.
“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.
Iran (at least with its current leadership) would be quite happy to use nukes on Israel if it weren't for mutually assured destruction. As it is having two powers with nukes in a region that despise each other leads to an unstable situation so it would definately be best if Iran did not get it hands on nuclear weapons. (Only Israel having them is an unfair, but stable situation).
North Korea - I have no idea. There is a lot of paranoia in that state and if they managed to convince themselves that they were directly under threat they may well launch nuclear weapons. Kind of how the USSR got extremely close to launching nuclear weapons when a glitch in the system made it appear that they were under attack (which they obviously were not).
I don't think either state should be allowed to get nuclear weapons. Strategic strikes on the facilities (and whatever the consequences) are preferable to setting the world in such an unstable state.
For that matter I don't think any country should have nuclear weapons, out of the countries that do have them the ones that are probably are most dangerous are Israel and Pakistan. Israel because its surrounded by enemies and Pakistan because the state is unstable.

Iran would be more likely to actually use it. North Korea would use it more as a bluff for leverage in the world political community.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson