I'm glad that they didn't just copy the Wii Motion +. Actually, I'm really surprised and excited about NATAL. Microsoft joined Nintendo and will sure see many new costumer because of it (especially casual gamers).

I want to know what people are thinking who have always been against motion controlling!

I find NATAL far more impressive than Wii Remote.

The Milo demonstration was insane. Everyone guessed the motion sensing, I don't think anyone guessed the voice and face recognition, that brings it to a whole other level.

The only thing was the noticeable lag between when you move and when the on screen character reacts so it's not going to replace a controller for something like shooters, but it DOES open up a whole new world of games to explore that have never been done.

I really hope for Sony's sake they don't announce some half-assed motion controller at tomorrow's conference or they're gonna look pretty silly compared to this.

They are working on 2 player recognition but theyre not there yet. It is single player untill 2 player is actually achievable.

They said it has the ability to capture multiple targets and is fully capable of multiplayer.

And as to that article, I highly doubt it is going to cost $200.  That would be ridiculously stupid.

you are just too excited right now....

think more logically, could someone play GTA IV, SSBB, Mario Galaxy, and all that with this project!?

it's main purpose is sports and it's a direct attack to Nintendo's Wii Sports and WM+

it is impressive at the begin but, it's virtual sports

what would REALLY amaze me would be a realistic shooter using this thing...

i'm really excited by the way, but i would no fucking way exchange the Wii for an Xbox360 with that thing

how is it going to measure exactly where your pointing? The luxury of planning 5yrs ahead gives Nintendo the ir pointer, a feature the 360 and its shooters needs.

I think it has 3 cameras in it, each pointing to a diffrent depth..

But not sure..

To me it seems like Standard MoCap tech crammed in to a small device. Do not expect the device to be cheap, and the development costs for developers using this will be even higher than they are now.

I think its great tech, but not particularly well suited for games, unless they release some perifereals (kinda like a wireless nunchuck for wii, otherwise voluntary forward movement is impossible)

I really don't see this capturing any massive market share. The people who will be most psyched about this are people who already own a 360. People who jumped on the motion bandwagon won't see enough of a difference to justify a minimum of 400 bucks more.

Should be cool to see what they can do with it though...