By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Games Radar gives Infamous 7/10

Undying said:
loy310 said:
Undying said:
loy310 said:

Fail. The link should prove them wrong.

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/games/g-51225/tt/metareviews.aspx?ListType=2&SortBy=reviewscore

what does that prove?

It proves that the game deserves higher than a 7, most legit sites scored it higher than 8.5, and most reviewers gave the game more credit for the good, unlike gamesrader who exaggerate how bad the controls were. Gamesrader review sounds biased towards Prototype.

Well its a good thing controls are not very important.

I agree, the controls are not spot on, but what sand box game has tight controls? 7 is too low for minor controls issues, control issue you get used to very quick. I've been playing the demo for 3 days now and I can honestly say that I can’t fell the controller in my hand anymore while playing the game. The controls grow on you very fast in the game.



Around the Network

Oh look it's a 360 fanboy making a thread about ragtag no name site reviewing infamous poorly.

So you think prototype will be better? Ps3 owners win either way.



Kantor said:
psrock said:
Uncharted got a 67 from the onion, a 67 folks.........


btw, Prototype is on the PS3 too, i seem to be repeating this fact.

Isn't The Onion a joke site?

well both site are a joke, but the AV club loses as it's not funny. Here's the review.

http://www.avclub.com/articles/uncharted-drakes-fortune,7347/

 

 



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
Undying said:
Blood_Tears said:
Boutros said:
Why posting the lowest scores?


Cause it's a PS3 exclusive and he does not want to see the game succeed naturally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV-8hyiUioI


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAVoQfoU0dQ

 



Firstly I found the review very informative for those that are well informed. Secondly that score is not a bad score. Most reviewers will tell you a seven out of ten is above average. Which means the game is a solid purchase. Thirdly the comparison to Crackdown gives a good comparable product to go by. For those PS3 only owners who have not had a chance to enjoy Crackdown it is a powerful game. The strength of the game lays within its three dimensional freedom. That offers a drastically different take on shooting, fighting, and terrain navigation that is wonderfully fresh. Basically they are saying it is close to Crackdown.

However their analysis compared to Prototype also tells me that of the two Prototype is closer to Crackdown. Which is telling me that the latter probably has more freedom, and from the videos it most certainly looks the part. Which makes me think Prototype may have the higher replay value. Everyone who has played Crackdown will tell you the joy is just sticking the game in, and joy riding the environment with nothing better to do then cause a little mayhem.

Anyone else think this story sounds familiar. Now I know what I am thinking of here it is.



Around the Network
loy310 said:
Undying said:
loy310 said:
Undying said:
loy310 said:

Fail. The link should prove them wrong.

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/games/g-51225/tt/metareviews.aspx?ListType=2&SortBy=reviewscore

what does that prove?

It proves that the game deserves higher than a 7, most legit sites scored it higher than 8.5, and most reviewers gave the game more credit for the good, unlike gamesrader who exaggerate how bad the controls were. Gamesrader review sounds biased towards Prototype.

Well its a good thing controls are not very important.

I agree, the controls are not spot on, but what sand box game has tight controls? 7 is too low for minor controls issues, control issue you get used to very quick. I've been playing the demo for 3 days now and I can honestly say that I can’t fell the controller in my hand anymore while playing the game. The controls grow on you very fast in the game.

Well the game is also a copy of every open world game. The only difference is you have lightning powers. Its Crackdown meets Static Shock.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a7/Static.jpg




Times Banned: 12

Press----------------> <----------------Press

Blood_Tears said:
Undying said:
Blood_Tears said:
Boutros said:
Why posting the lowest scores?


Cause it's a PS3 exclusive and he does not want to see the game succeed naturally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV-8hyiUioI


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAVoQfoU0dQ

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZimumOkA1s




Times Banned: 12

Press----------------> <----------------Press

Undying said:
Kantor said:
Undying said:
Blood_Tears said:
Boutros said:
Why posting the lowest scores?


Cause it's a PS3 exclusive and he does not want to see the game succeed naturally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV-8hyiUioI

Well, why did you pick the lowest of 32 reviews, and then make a thread about it, instead of posting it in the official thread?

To make you made. I don't really care if the game does well or not, it looks kinda boring to me though.

You don't care for the game, you find it boring, and then you go look for the lowest scored review to post so you can  piss peoople off , well done my friend, well done.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
psrock said:
Undying said:
Kantor said:
Undying said:
Blood_Tears said:
Boutros said:
Why posting the lowest scores?


Cause it's a PS3 exclusive and he does not want to see the game succeed naturally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV-8hyiUioI

Well, why did you pick the lowest of 32 reviews, and then make a thread about it, instead of posting it in the official thread?

To make you made. I don't really care if the game does well or not, it looks kinda boring to me though.

You don't care for the game, you find it boring, and then you go look for the lowest scored review to post so you can  piss peoople off , well done my friend, well done.

;)




Times Banned: 12

Press----------------> <----------------Press

Undying said:
loy310 said:
Undying said:
loy310 said:
Undying said:
loy310 said:

Fail. The link should prove them wrong.

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/games/g-51225/tt/metareviews.aspx?ListType=2&SortBy=reviewscore

what does that prove?

It proves that the game deserves higher than a 7, most legit sites scored it higher than 8.5, and most reviewers gave the game more credit for the good, unlike gamesrader who exaggerate how bad the controls were. Gamesrader review sounds biased towards Prototype.

Well its a good thing controls are not very important.

I agree, the controls are not spot on, but what sand box game has tight controls? 7 is too low for minor controls issues, control issue you get used to very quick. I've been playing the demo for 3 days now and I can honestly say that I can’t fell the controller in my hand anymore while playing the game. The controls grow on you very fast in the game.

Well the game is also a copy of every open world game. The only difference is you have lightning powers. Its Crackdown meets Static Shock.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a7/Static.jpg

Have you played the demo? Just thought I might ask.