By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is 360 The Standard Bearer This Gen.

reask on 22 May 2009
leo-j said:
I totally agree with you, I remember buying resistance at launch, and I was blown away.. my first FPS as well

 

Yes but which came out first?

I mean had you played COD2 prior to it would it have been that good.



 

 

 

 

Around the Network
COKTOE on 22 May 2009

No. Too many frickin' issues. The only system I've ever bailed on. It's a tough call though cause every system has problems. In spite of the it's drop in sales verses last-gen, I vote for PS3 over the 360. The Wii has been a huge success, but it has the weakest library, relatively speaking, for my money.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

adjohnston10 on 22 May 2009

i'd say wii is the standard. then u get a 360 or a ps3 to go along with it. imo



 

 

reask on 22 May 2009
kowenicki said:
MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. IMO Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

Fixed.

And IMO nothing yet released on the Wii compares to Mass Effect, Bioshock, Fall Out 3 etc etc

 



 

 

 

 

MontanaHatchet on 22 May 2009
reask said:
MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

This game came out in 05 montana, it was a launch game I beleive.

Hundreds of games are way better than this game now.

But if you played it then it would have blown you away is my point.

I mean the Xbox was always playing catch up to PS2.

I just reckon we have a role reversal now.

Think about it, Xbox was supposed to be better than PS2, PS3 supposed to be superior to 360.

Yet games look no better or worse on either one.

So that was the essence of my thoughts.

Define catchup, really. Game quality? The console with the lowest userbase is not going to have the best games.

Kowenicki: And they're all PC games too.

 



 

 

Around the Network
Megadude on 22 May 2009

Oh boy is this a flamebait trap set to get me banned before E3?



MrBubbles on 22 May 2009
MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

vampire rain is pretty close...



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Megadude on 22 May 2009
MontanaHatchet said:
reask said:
MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

This game came out in 05 montana, it was a launch game I beleive.

Hundreds of games are way better than this game now.

But if you played it then it would have blown you away is my point.

I mean the Xbox was always playing catch up to PS2.

I just reckon we have a role reversal now.

Think about it, Xbox was supposed to be better than PS2, PS3 supposed to be superior to 360.

Yet games look no better or worse on either one.

So that was the essence of my thoughts.

Define catchup, really. Game quality? The console with the lowest userbase is not going to have the best games.

Kowenicki: And they're all PC games too.

 

So Ironic because these are the only PC games I bought in the last year too.

 



The_God_of_War on 22 May 2009

I'm not 100% sure what you're asking. Catching up to the 360 in game library or graphics/technical achievements? I'd say it's done the former and has surpassed the 360 for the latter.



  

reask on 22 May 2009
MontanaHatchet said:
reask said:
MontanaHatchet said:
So basically, you thought Call of Duty 2 was a really good game, even better than a bunch of PS3 titles you've never played? You also completely ignored the Wii. Nothing released on the 360 yet compares to Super Mario Galaxy.

 

This game came out in 05 montana, it was a launch game I beleive.

Hundreds of games are way better than this game now.

But if you played it then it would have blown you away is my point.

I mean the Xbox was always playing catch up to PS2.

I just reckon we have a role reversal now.

Think about it, Xbox was supposed to be better than PS2, PS3 supposed to be superior to 360.

Yet games look no better or worse on either one.

So that was the essence of my thoughts.

Define catchup, really. Game quality? The console with the lowest userbase is not going to have the best games.

Kowenicki: And they're all PC games too.

 

 

Ok then I will site one example Fallout 3.

No trophies inferior graphics.

Now thats a recent game.

So trophies to counter acheievements.

BR to be the new dvd format.

PSN to counter live.

that is my point.