By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - IGN: Bionic Commando Review.

SHMUPGurus on 18 May 2009

And we all wonder what the complaints are all about... >_>



Random game thought :
Why is Bionic Commando Rearmed 2 getting so much hate? We finally get a real game and they're not even satisfied... I'm starting to hate the gaming community so f****** much...

Watch my insane gameplay videos on my YouTube page!

Around the Network
The_vagabond7 on 18 May 2009

Seeing as how IGN grades on a 7-10 scale, this doesn't impress. I knew they wouldn't rate this below an 8, and it actually hit 8. So this is most likely a mediocre game with above average production value. I will give this game a condescending yawn, and move on.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

SHMUPGurus on 19 May 2009
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
Pipedream24 said:
KylieDog said:
Since Capcom decided to be asses and make the demo XBL exclusive Capcom get my middle finger with this game. I'll buy it cheap and used, if I buy it at all.

 Why are Capcom asses?  Isn't Sony the one charging download fees to developers on PSN?  My guess is you'll start seeing more exclusive demos on live until Sony changes their tune.

Well said! Sadly, some people don't even know about this. It's so easy to claim something when you don't even know the motives behind the decision in the first place.

...and you both know Microsoft has a charge for things also?

 

 

Capcom are asses, simple as.   It isn't even like RE5 were RE4 players at least know roughly what the game was like, when was the last 3D Bionic Commando?  Oh, never, so they decide to not have a demo for the PSN?

 

Sorry but that is retarded.

Yes indeed, and it's not like we got the demo for free anyways. We made a decision to pay for our monthly subscription to Xbox Live. This is why Microsoft don't make publishers pay to release their demos and stuff.

With that said, Capcom can easily test their game's multiplayer matchmaking system on a reliable network with more players around the world without worrying about costs. So, they're basically asses because they decided to go for the logical choice here?

I was not talking about the LIVE monthly fee.  Microsoft has charges for devs completely unreleated to anything to do with the LIVE fee.

We have proof, according to many articles like this one, that Sony charges publishers/developers for PS3 bandwidth. I dare you to find an article stating that Microsoft does the same.



Random game thought :
Why is Bionic Commando Rearmed 2 getting so much hate? We finally get a real game and they're not even satisfied... I'm starting to hate the gaming community so f****** much...

Watch my insane gameplay videos on my YouTube page!

radha on 19 May 2009

gametrailers gave it a 7.7 so thats the end of it to me, not interested anymore, may rent it or borrow it, oh and PSU gave it a 7.0



dd if = /dev/brain | tail -f | grep games | nc -lnvvp 80

Hey Listen!

https://archive.org/details/kohina_radio_music_collection

perpride on 19 May 2009
SHMUPGurus said:
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
Pipedream24 said:
KylieDog said:
Since Capcom decided to be asses and make the demo XBL exclusive Capcom get my middle finger with this game. I'll buy it cheap and used, if I buy it at all.

 Why are Capcom asses?  Isn't Sony the one charging download fees to developers on PSN?  My guess is you'll start seeing more exclusive demos on live until Sony changes their tune.

Well said! Sadly, some people don't even know about this. It's so easy to claim something when you don't even know the motives behind the decision in the first place.

...and you both know Microsoft has a charge for things also?

 

 

Capcom are asses, simple as.   It isn't even like RE5 were RE4 players at least know roughly what the game was like, when was the last 3D Bionic Commando?  Oh, never, so they decide to not have a demo for the PSN?

 

Sorry but that is retarded.

Yes indeed, and it's not like we got the demo for free anyways. We made a decision to pay for our monthly subscription to Xbox Live. This is why Microsoft don't make publishers pay to release their demos and stuff.

With that said, Capcom can easily test their game's multiplayer matchmaking system on a reliable network with more players around the world without worrying about costs. So, they're basically asses because they decided to go for the logical choice here?

I was not talking about the LIVE monthly fee.  Microsoft has charges for devs completely unreleated to anything to do with the LIVE fee.

We have proof, according to many articles like this one, that Sony charges publishers/developers for PS3 bandwidth. I dare you to find an article stating that Microsoft does the same.

 

I don't have any proof that MS does the same...but does that mean you are going to argue that they don't? Cause that will make me lmao at your simplicity.



Around the Network
Pipedream24 on 19 May 2009
perpride said:
SHMUPGurus said:
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
KylieDog said:
SHMUPGurus said:
Pipedream24 said:
KylieDog said:
Since Capcom decided to be asses and make the demo XBL exclusive Capcom get my middle finger with this game. I'll buy it cheap and used, if I buy it at all.

 Why are Capcom asses?  Isn't Sony the one charging download fees to developers on PSN?  My guess is you'll start seeing more exclusive demos on live until Sony changes their tune.

Well said! Sadly, some people don't even know about this. It's so easy to claim something when you don't even know the motives behind the decision in the first place.

...and you both know Microsoft has a charge for things also?

 

 

Capcom are asses, simple as.   It isn't even like RE5 were RE4 players at least know roughly what the game was like, when was the last 3D Bionic Commando?  Oh, never, so they decide to not have a demo for the PSN?

 

Sorry but that is retarded.

Yes indeed, and it's not like we got the demo for free anyways. We made a decision to pay for our monthly subscription to Xbox Live. This is why Microsoft don't make publishers pay to release their demos and stuff.

With that said, Capcom can easily test their game's multiplayer matchmaking system on a reliable network with more players around the world without worrying about costs. So, they're basically asses because they decided to go for the logical choice here?

I was not talking about the LIVE monthly fee.  Microsoft has charges for devs completely unreleated to anything to do with the LIVE fee.

We have proof, according to many articles like this one, that Sony charges publishers/developers for PS3 bandwidth. I dare you to find an article stating that Microsoft does the same.

 

I don't have any proof that MS does the same...but does that mean you are going to argue that they don't? Cause that will make me lmao at your simplicity.

So stating something as a fact with absolutely nothing to back it up is ok?  Hmmm.... Call me simplistic but in the real world they call statements like that bullshit. 

I don't blame Sony for charging developers download fees.  They are trying to find a way to keep PSN free for their users and thats great.  But you can expect that some content won't make it on PSN.  If missing out on the occasional demo keeps their online service free, that to me seems a pretty acceptable trade off.

Microsoft doesn't need to charge developers for content.  As a matter of fact, isn't Microsoft the company that has been paying for exclusive content on Live?