By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Cage: Heavy Rain not possible on Xbox 360

Zizzla_Rachet said:
Skeeuk said:
sorry to rain in like this, but just for thought..........ps3 in its 3rd year and 360 in its 4rth year..........HOW COME WE HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY RAIN ON 360? in grafix technical dept?

 

 

those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good

 



Around the Network
@Staude how do you know if a game is 2x as good as the 360 game? The levels are still LINEAR the physics are still half sas.

 

 



rckrz6 said:
alephnull said:
rckrz6 said:
Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
I don't need to try, the ps3 and xbox have similiar processing power

 

Actually the cell is a more powerful processor and it specifies in some things where it completely violates the 360... and those are the areas they've made use off. Like in flower.

 

Not to say the 360s processor is bad at all. It's not.. But they work completely different.

 

and xenos is better then the rsx.. what xbox loses in cpu power is made up in gpu power.  The rsx bottlenecks the ps3 terribly.   In overall perfomance, anyone who builds computers knows that having a better gpu yeields way  better results then buying a medicore gpu with a top notch cpu.  Its all about where your bottle neck is.  Your only as fast as your slowest componnent

You mean people who build computers out of comodity x86 hardware for best buy. The high performance computing crowd tend not to agree with you.

Also if you are only as fast as your slowest component, then maybe we should all start hacking the usb controllers off our mother boards.

 

games aren't running off your usb controller

        a 9500gt running with a i7 will run a slower framte rate then a 9800gt running with a core2.   ive been building gamming machines since pentium 2.   Why?  because video cards do a good majority of the work.   If your talking about pure processoring power outside of gamming then your not on the same page as me

 

Realise you can't compare pc processors with that of the ps3 since it's built differently. I already showed on another page how the spus are actually working in both the graphics and processing departments increasing the visual output capable of the ps3.

 

@zizzla_rachet.. that doesn't look.. that good.. modelwise it's Okay.

 



Check out my game about moles ^

rckrz6 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Skeeuk said:
sorry to rain in like this, but just for thought..........ps3 in its 3rd year and 360 in its 4rth year..........HOW COME WE HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY RAIN ON 360? in grafix technical dept?

 

 

those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good

 

 

How are you sure?



 



Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
alephnull said:
rckrz6 said:
Staude said:
rckrz6 said:
I don't need to try, the ps3 and xbox have similiar processing power

 

Actually the cell is a more powerful processor and it specifies in some things where it completely violates the 360... and those are the areas they've made use off. Like in flower.

 

Not to say the 360s processor is bad at all. It's not.. But they work completely different.

 

and xenos is better then the rsx.. what xbox loses in cpu power is made up in gpu power.  The rsx bottlenecks the ps3 terribly.   In overall perfomance, anyone who builds computers knows that having a better gpu yeields way  better results then buying a medicore gpu with a top notch cpu.  Its all about where your bottle neck is.  Your only as fast as your slowest componnent

You mean people who build computers out of comodity x86 hardware for best buy. The high performance computing crowd tend not to agree with you.

Also if you are only as fast as your slowest component, then maybe we should all start hacking the usb controllers off our mother boards.

 

games aren't running off your usb controller

        a 9500gt running with a i7 will run a slower framte rate then a 9800gt running with a core2.   ive been building gamming machines since pentium 2.   Why?  because video cards do a good majority of the work.   If your talking about pure processoring power outside of gamming then your not on the same page as me

 

Realise you can't compare pc processors with that of the ps3 since it's built differently. I already showed on another page how the spus are actually working in both the graphics and processing departments increasing the visual output capable of the ps3.

 

@zizzla_rachet.. that doesn't look.. that good.. modelwise it's Okay.

 

alephnull said what i said is not true about PC gamming, lets leave ps3 out of this for the momment

 



Around the Network
Zizzla_Rachet said:
rckrz6 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Skeeuk said:
sorry to rain in like this, but just for thought..........ps3 in its 3rd year and 360 in its 4rth year..........HOW COME WE HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING LIKE HEAVY RAIN ON 360? in grafix technical dept?

 

 

those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good

 

 

How are you sure?

how am i sure of what

 



those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good



 



Zizzla_Rachet said:
those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good

 

I know they pc shots because they are taken directly from the pc tech demo's.   there has been no xbox demo.  im guessing the xbox version will loook almost as good, why do you feel the need to argue on this



rckrz6 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
those are PC shots, but im sure xbox will be almost as good

 

I know they pc shots because they are taken directly from the pc tech demo's.   there has been no xbox demo.  im guessing the xbox version will loook almost as good, why do you feel the need to argue on this

 

Just asking what made you sure....