I have both games, but Ive never played Gears 2 online so I am just comparing the campaigns on both games.
-Gears 1 was shorter, but better. It kept me wanting more. Gears 2 in comparison felt like it was dragging on and on way too much.
-Gears 2 had some awful level design. Fighting in a monsters belly? Ugh.
-Gears 2 had a horrible ending/boss fight. What the heck was THAT? I respect Epic, but it seemed as if they were just like "meh, we've worked on this game long enough, let's just end it with a half assed boss battle. The sad thing is -- I was HAPPY to finish, as I felt a constant "is this game over yet?" rather than "I dont want this game to ever end" that I felt with Gears 1
-Gears 2 felt choppy. Bad frame rate at times.
-While playing through Gears 2, I only ran out of ammo ONCE the entire campaign. I'm not saying that's a good or bad thing, but I do recall ammo being more scarce in the first game.
-Gears 2 IMO had too many "let's steal the Locusts reavers/whatever and use it against them" moments. Too many vehicle/point-and-shoot parts in the game, whereas Gears 1 was a pure cover and kill, Third Person Shooter. Just my opinion, as I realise some people may actually prefer that.
QUESTIONS:
1. Which Gears game did you enjoy more?
2. Since Ive never played Gears 2 online...is it any better, or different than Gears 1 online?
"I don't have time to play video games anymore, but if I did, I would definitely choose the PlayStation 3 instead of the 360" - President Barack Obama









