What you are talking about is part of String Theory- as I said in all the text- the Theory is not proven and considered by some to be unprovable and thus phylosophy. (Even Witten the unifier of the 5 major theories of string theory said that the theory was murky.)

The top advocates all say that the theory is only speculation. (Even Witten)

The same justification that you give String Theory is infact an excuse that you should allow the Designer.

The Designer would not be subject to the LAWS of the system that they designed.

It is the same reason why people need String Theory to be (not that it bothers me ) and put their faith in it.

But why allow for eternity in one case and then revolk it in another?

Wess this post gave me a headache, and CHYUII, you aren't helping.

Nothing is "more" or "less" evolved than anything else, ebcause evolution is not a linear process! That's a stupidi dea that's been perpetuated by Saturday morning cartoons and the Mario Bros. movie - there's no such thing as "devolution" i.e. evolution in reverse, because evolution is not linear - evolution is the adaptation to a given environment. You can't be "less evolved" than somehting else, you just evolved differently. I'm not more evolved than my dog, it just means that my ancestors changedd in ways that allowed them to fill a very different but still specific niche - we just interpret that as "higher evolution" or higher complexity as a leftover line of thought from religious doctrine that taught we were of a higher state than other animals.

We aren't.

Different races can't be more or less evolved. That's stupid and it's racist.

But it's true that we didn't involve in the same way, tooo. Me and my fiance come from different evolutionary backgrounds because our ancestors had to fill separate evolutionary niches in order to adapt best to their environments. And if we have kids, well, they'll be different too.

Sorry if it seems like I'm ranting, it's just that people interpreting evolution as being a linear process really, really burns me up.

Is that because you've got a sure-fire ticket to hell for believing in evolution?

I would need to ask my pastor I guess

USA. Evolution.

The Bible could potentially support it. God is perfection. Humans are made "in his image," since evolution naturally leads towards perfection, and we're the most evolved group, then there's biblical evolution.

Wess this post gave me a headache, and CHYUII, you aren't helping.

Nothing is "more" or "less" evolved than anything else, ebcause evolution is not a linear process! That's a stupidi dea that's been perpetuated by Saturday morning cartoons and the Mario Bros. movie - there's no such thing as "devolution" i.e. evolution in reverse, because evolution is not linear - evolution is the adaptation to a given environment. You can't be "less evolved" than somehting else, you just evolved differently. I'm not more evolved than my dog, it just means that my ancestors changedd in ways that allowed them to fill a very different but still specific niche - we just interpret that as "higher evolution" or higher complexity as a leftover line of thought from religious doctrine that taught we were of a higher state than other animals.

We aren't.

Different races can't be more or less evolved. That's stupid and it's racist.

But it's true that we didn't involve in the same way, tooo. Me and my fiance come from different evolutionary backgrounds because our ancestors had to fill separate evolutionary niches in order to adapt best to their environments. And if we have kids, well, they'll be different too.

Sorry if it seems like I'm ranting, it's just that people interpreting evolution as being a linear process really, really burns me up.

First, at CHYUII, There's more races than the human race...

I'm not saying any one race is better or worse, because there's large genetic variation between individuals. I never said evolution was a linear process.

Different races can be more or less evolved in different areas. Darker people have skin that is better for sun protection. When white man invaded native peoples, some died because their immune systems weren't as evolved.

Khuutra, you seem to contradict youself.

"Different races can't be more or less evolved. That's stupid and it's racist." 

"our ancestors had to fill separate evolutionary niches in order to adapt best to their environments."

Is being more evolved somehow different from being more adapted to your environment?

Also, why don't you believe in the concept of devolution? Over generations of inbreeding, or exposure to substances or radiation that can damage DNA, animals can become less adapted to thier environment. Or maybe that's called something different than devolution.