By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - The PS3 won't make it past 2012 in America at retail.

dahuman said:
When we talk about MS, we talk about their gaming divisions, not their computer ones, the same is true for Sony, if the PS3 is starting to become dead weight and Blu-Ray players are already getting much cheaper than a PS3 even now, then that factor is absolutely useless. On the other hand, Nintendo only makes video games, and apparently they are better at managing their company than Sony, how's that for a fact? besides, in the near future, HVD will most likely take over and nobody will care about Blu-Ray that much unless people start to catch up soon.

 

lol hvd in the near future, you really think theres many willing to push a new format so soon ?  Like with all products, companys want to milk them as long as possible.  No one wants to try to push a new format so soon, it be to costly for them and would piss of consumers by tellig them they need to once agian buy new hardware.

At one time all of Sony was dead weight for SCE, things change but the corp as a whole continues.  



Around the Network
twingo said:
dahuman said:
When we talk about MS, we talk about their gaming divisions, not their computer ones, the same is true for Sony, if the PS3 is starting to become dead weight and Blu-Ray players are already getting much cheaper than a PS3 even now, then that factor is absolutely useless. On the other hand, Nintendo only makes video games, and apparently they are better at managing their company than Sony, how's that for a fact? besides, in the near future, HVD will most likely take over and nobody will care about Blu-Ray that much unless people start to catch up soon.

 

lol hvd in the near future, you really think theres many willing to push a new format so soon ?  Like with all products, companys want to milk them as long as possible.  No one wants to try to push a new format so soon, it be to costly for them and would piss of consumers by tellig them they need to once agian buy new hardware.

At one time all of Sony was dead weight for SCE, things change but the corp as a whole continues.  

yeah blu ray gots the support, if they want they can shove it up your throat.

same would have happen if HD DVD win its a better format win. i can make full images of my HDD now =D



Squilliam said:

Thats what I believe. Does anyone have any good reason to counter that without referencing a 10 year plan?

Retailers and consumers decide how long something remains on the shelves. So if there are next generation consoles competing for shelf space, that shelf space is only going to come out of the lowest selling consoles alotment. It happens every time a generation switch over occours, and there has never been a precedent where 2-3 next generation and 2-3 current generation consoles have been sold at the same time at retail. So why would we face anything different if the same basic reasons behind this are the same? Since the PS3 is the lowest selling console, it will be the first to get kicked to the curb.

 

The recession isn't over yet.  It won't be over in 2010.  By 2012 no one will even hope for the end becase they will hav by then faced reality. The recession will continue for about a decade or so, if we're lucky, and consumer spending will continue to go down as unemployment continues to go up.  In the face of such a horrible economic climate no one will want to release new products until it's absolutely necessary.  For the video game market it is not necessary to release a new wave of products for at least 2-3 years.  Sony continues to support old products after the new product is out.  If there's no need for a PS4 before 2012, there's no way in hell it will lose retail support by then.  In fact, you're ****ing crazy (or is it crazzy?) to make such a suggestion.  Good luck with your new jacket.



You do not have the right to never be offended.

Infinity said:
The only way the 360 is not going to come in dead last in worldwide sales this generation is a $99 Arcade model being announced at E3. Microsoft's investors are already crying foul at all the money being wasted on the 360, the weakest product in the whole company. The only way they could sustain a $99 price point is to liquidate their remaining units and discontinue the 360. I think that they will not do this and Microsoft's stock value will continue to tank as the current leadership insists on throwing more money at this product.

 

 

I find it very difficult to believe this is a real post....he's joking right? The 360 is far from a failure and perhaps with the last xbox shareholders were worried but not so with the 360. Do you realize just how much cash they make off of xbox Live alone? As to your prediction that the only way to not come in last this gen is a 99 dollar arcade I have a simple question to ask you.

If they are so doomed to last place then why is it outselling the playstation every week? Go ahead and use the whole price exscuse all you want but I'm getting tired of hearing that.  Sony set the price that way so if thats the answer its not that MS is lucky.  Sony shot themselves in the foot and shouldn't have been so arrogant.  Its their own fault they're in last.



@twingo

I think you misread, the dead weight is the PS3, not SCE itself, I think internally, they've already realized that it's a failure, and so far they have no real way to recover but they have to at least try to keep their share holders by doing lousy PRs and make first party exclusives that don't sell nearly as well as a lot of the 3rd party software or Nintendo first party software. PS3 is not a technical marvel, it's a shortsight, Sony fucked up on this one and they are suffering hard, it doesn't even matter if BR is doing well or not tbh, the company as a whole is loosing a ton of money where even when Nintendo was loosing on numbers, they made real profit each year.

Luckily, they are not Sega, they have other assets to fall back on before they dry up so they really need to figure something out fast.



Around the Network
nightsurge said:
AFFLICTION said:
i love people who make threads like this to start shit

i love people who don't read the thread and even when they do they don't understand what he is saying so they try to start shit

Seriously people, there is absolutely nothing wrong with his logic. And have any of you noticed HE IS JUST REFERENCING AMERICA AKA THE USA (and surrounding countries)! You know, the place where the 360 has almost ALWAYS sold more regardless of price cuts. Where the 360 has over a 9 million lead alone! Where the PS3 sells poorest in comparison to other regions!

Gosh, sometimes people need to read and think and understand before trying to label someone as intelligent as Squilliam a fanboy.

The Gamecube was dropped like a rock after the new gen started. It was in last place in sales in the US. The PS2 still sells to this day because it was the market leader. The Xbox was dropped just for Microsoft to focus all its attention on its real investment and first major push as making a thriving console after the original Xbox Live was such a success.

The PS3 is now in last place by a VERY long shot. More than double their total even in the US. If any console is going to be dropped from retailers due to lacking sales at the launch of the next generation of consoles it will be the PS3 in the US. Sure that year may not be 2012. It could be 2011 or it could be 2013 or 2014. Regardless, whenever that year comes the PS3 will be cut first and that will stop the 10 year plan in its tracks for America AKA the USA.

 

What he's getting at is that from the beginning, this thread has done little more than state the obvious in an apparent attempt to bash the PS3, and even then, it's extremely flawed.

As I've already stated, by 2012, all three console manufacturers will have released their next console. When that happens, both the PS3 and 360 are gone because they don't have very broad appeal, and most of the gamers to whom they do appeal(the core and the hardcore) and going to jump to the next-gen consoles. Only the console with universal appeal, the Wii, is guaranteed to still be around at that point.

Even if you argue that the PS3 will vanish first, then the 360 won't be that far behind, because the combined userbase is what's keeping the two consoles alive. If one is missing, then the other one will die, even in N. America.

 

 



 

Consoles owned: Saturn, Dreamcast, PS1, PS2, PSP, DS, PS3

HappySqurriel said:
Jo21 said:

GOOD then the ps3 may be even cheaper! 100$

 

 

Maybe, but probably not ...

The biggest mistake any console manufacturer ever made when it comes to producing an inexpensive console was include a hard-drive as a default. Hard-drives are very cost effective in a per-(mega/giga/tera)byte measure but, no matter how old they get, they never become an inexpensive component; in 2012, when Sony still has to devote $40 to $60 towards their hard-drive it will be amazingly difficult to reduce the price of the PS3 to $100 ... With manufacturing, distribution, and the tiny ammount of retail mark-up I wouldn't expect the PS3 to ever be (much) below $150 to $200 unless Sony was taking a loss on every unit sold.

Easy: they can put out a cheap model with a smallish solid state drive. Even with HDD increasing in size and never falling under a certain cost, solid state will always be available for smaller and cheaper solutions.

 



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

Teh 10 year plan!



Zones said:
Haven't you heard we all will die in 2012?

 

 You're talking about the Inca calander... the Inca had Time wrong...



^It's Mayan, actually...



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman