| hatmoza 2.0 said: I thought people played games for the enjoyment of just playing games ! Because i dont remember playing "Super Mario Brothers " for any Trophies/achievments. |
I never said i play games for trophies only.
1.First i play the game to complete it
2.Then i play it for fun/enjoyment
3.Then for trophies
arent those 3 supposed to be a whole? do you force yourself not to have any fun while completing it first through listening to barry manilows discography on shuffle
sounds more like a vivisection to me to split it in 3 ^_0
BladeOfGod said:
(i added numbers to your sentences)
1.Oh but i will. Like the most of non trophy and non online games.
2. That's your opinnion
3. For most games, yes. But games like Warhawk, Counter Strike and Burnout Paradise, the online is what makes the game so good.
4.If you have lots of trophies that means you are a good gamer :)
|
4. Actually it means you have a lot of time.
Buy the game, trophy support < good game.
| Wookaroo said: Because RPG's with no trophies and no online have no replay value. VC took me about 45 hours being that I did a lot of skirmishes and played through everything pretty slowly. I was doing my best to savor the experience. There are actually a few skirmishes I never played as well! Now I'm ready to go through the game again for the additional goodies a replay offers. I expect to get another 20-30 hours of enjoyment before I even touch the DLCs! Anyway, to those that won't touch a great game because it doesn't have trophies- 1.Would you still be so passionate about trophies if no one else could see them? Be honest. :P I've always thought a gamer is one who plays great games when he/she can. Gamers will try unique and interesting titles to experience the innovation they offer. They'll actively contribute to the success of such titles. In my opinion, a gamer won't discriminate against content they have not yet touched due to a socially based reward system not being included. A gamer appreciates art, game play, story, and of course....innovation among other things. They won't allow trophies or achievements to stop them!  I guess I need to get with the times though. 2.The new age gamer seems to care more about icons displayed in their online profiles so that they might be reminded each day that they have the time and patience to achieve great things. They can't keep such memories in their heads, they need them displayed for all to see so that they might be known and respected. 3.Of course this type of gamer appreciates innovation, art, story, game play... but only if trophies or achievements are rewarded for experiencing such things. This is obviously just my jaded opinion, so take it with a grain of salt. In the future, 4.I'm sure just about every title with be required to have trophies anyway. :) |
1.YES I WOULD.
2.Yup, that's pretty much it :)
3.I said i like lots of games who DONT HAVE TROPHIES, but HAVE REPLAY VALUE.
4.That's the hope :)
Why am i atacked here because i like trophies??? That's just my taste. If you dont like trophies or if you dont care just dont collect them.
| terislb said: arent those 3 supposed to be a whole? do you force yourself not to have any fun while completing it first through listening to barry manilows discography on shuffle sounds more like a vivisection to me to split it in 3 ^_0 |
You just love to attack me don't you?
my good sir if i wanted to attack you ..there would be no doubt for you if i am or not
but no i was not attacking you..and it was not my intention to offend you
your statement merely seemed odd to me.. it sounded more like a medical procedure involving surgery than playing a game for the fun of it
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
