By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - ps3 is definitely NOT the future, now, R_E_A_D

Some people believe PS3 is the future because those people perceive it as having a stronger line up for this and next year, and have potentials that are yet untapped, while they believe that the 360's line up is weaker, and it has maxed its technological capacity.

Is that a fact? No. Some people think that Infamous looks mediocre, graphics aren't that important, and are looking forward for multiplatform games.

I stopped reading after the second paragraph... You don't sound intelligent (if that's what you were going for), just unable to communicate your ideas briefly, coherently, and in a organized manner.



Around the Network

^ Shouldn't you give the benifit of charity to people and instead argue about their intended to say, not pick holes in their arguments structure? Thats the higher ground, and unfortunately you're not on it.



Tease.

ahaha squill, another zinger!



CGI-Quality said:
Tread carefully, B_E_L_I_E_V_E is my slogan >=[

 

I thought Believe was Halo 3's slogan??



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

gebx said:
CGI-Quality said:
Tread carefully, B_E_L_I_E_V_E is my slogan >=[

 

I thought Believe was Halo 3's slogan??

 



Around the Network

The ps3 is the only system to be made without saturated fat or death crystals though. So it must be the winner!! :D



At least others are realizing this is just a joke post.



The Halo francise is the most overrated bland game to ever hit the console market. It provides a bad name to all FPS that even showed effort at creating an original entertaining plot.

I probably have more ps3 games than you :/ 

^orca
that all depends. I'm pretty sure saturated fat is mainstream? If so, then we are really really far behind.

@Casey

I was afraid for my life for a while there.



Squilliam said:
^ Shouldn't you give the benifit of charity to people and instead argue about their intended to say, not pick holes in their arguments structure? Thats the higher ground, and unfortunately you're not on it.

 

???

I don't know what you're telling me, but the only thing I said to the OP himself was that his post was incoherent and long winded, and that if he was trying to sound intelligent by doing that (as many people do) it doesn't. I can't argue against what he intended to say because his post wasn't getting to the point, and I didn't even read the whole post.

All I did was make the really general statement that opinions are subjective.



Damn you fanboy's are sad.

who the hell writes a essay that is e totally pointless.

GET A LIFE.