EaglesEye379 said:
Rpruett said:
EaglesEye379 said: Microsoft has allowed 'tons' of new successful IP to be created this gen as well - Gears, Mass Effect, Viva Pinata, Crackdown, and Alan Wake (since you want to mention MAG - an unknown quantity just the same). |
How many of those can be bought on PC versus Console? I certainly have enjoyed many of those games since my 360 broke.
|
Is this just an excuse to flame MS / 360?
Your earlier argument was that Sony has put their name/money to some IP. Furthermore, you said this is why you prefer the PS3 over the 360. Well, Im just pointing out certain IP that MS has put their name/money on which is just as successful and also you cant get on the PS3. And whether you can get it on the PC, I dont see how this is relevant when MS still gave birth to those IP (although duh they are Games for Windows so MS still gets publishing fees).
|
Not at all. The reason I really do at the core like Sony as a video game maker has never been sales or anything else. Just the fact that they always have had wonderful franchises that would just get created out of thin air. Nintendo not so much. (Beyond their originals) and Microsoft not so much either.
And no 360 didn't give birth to these games if I can play them elsewhere. That's the point. Multi-platform games I wouldn't count. I can play Mass Effect, Gears and Alan Wake on PC. If Xbox 360 didn't exist, I could still play those games on PC for certain. You can't say the same about most of the PS3 exclusives.
That's the whole point. What IPs has Microsoft come up with for their original Xbox / 360 that actually have been 'new' and not just taken another companies exclusivity from a game? Halo and ... ? I mean hell even Halo I could play on PC.