HappySqurriel said:
I would potentially argue that Nintendo is worth more than Sony ... Sony has high revenues but they also have very high costs so their profits stay reasonably low on the whole; this results in a very low profit per-share ratio and slow growth rates. Nintendo (on the other hand) has lower revenues and dramatically lower costs which means they have higher profits, better profits per-share and a faster growth rate. When you consider what their profits could be like in 2 years if they continue to dominate in the market like they have been, it becomes clear that Nintendo has a far superior business model and may be worth more. |
uhh WHAT?
you spend $10 and make $50.
wow 1 - 5 cost/revenue ratio!!
I spend $1000 and make $2000.
not so steller 1 - 2 cost/revenue ratio
guess what, I am worth more then you!
" better profits per-share and a faster growth rate" profits per share & growth rate are not how you measure a company's total worth. Sony is one of the largest companys in the world and here you are spouting finanical phrases and proclaiming Nintendo to be worth more.












