By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - I'm baaaack!!!!

Mafoo's kind of outside what most Republicans believe. Mafoo is pretty libertarian but is also more pro-military than most libertarians.

Tyrannical is more in line with the "Republican philosophy".



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Around the Network
akuma587 said:
Mafoo's kind of outside what most Republicans believe. Mafoo is pretty libertarian but is also more pro-military than most libertarians.

Tyrannical is more in line with the "Republican philosophy".

This, although I think most libertarians are for a strong military. I have a very strong respect for the people in our military, even though I dislike the decision by our politicians to go to war in Iraq.

As for people calling me “right wing” earlier, that's funny. We have been talking about fiscal responsibility in these forums. If we were talking about abortion, gay rights, legalizing drugs, or any number of other social responsibilities, the last thing people would call me is “right wing” ;)

 



And brought back with a fitting Aerosmith song, nice



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:
Mafoo's kind of outside what most Republicans believe. Mafoo is pretty libertarian but is also more pro-military than most libertarians.

Tyrannical is more in line with the "Republican philosophy".

This, although I think most libertarians are for a strong military. I have a very strong respect for the people in our military, even though I dislike the decision by our politicians to go to war in Iraq.

As for people calling me “right wing” earlier, that's funny. We have been talking about fiscal responsibility in these forums. If we were talking about abortion, gay rights, legalizing drugs, or any number of other social responsibilities, the last thing people would call me is “right wing” ;)

 

Yeah, ironically for how many fights me and Mafoo get in the only issues we really disagree on are the government's role in the economy (obviously that is a pretty big issue) and the degree to which we are "pro-military."  Other than that, we don't disagree on very much.  I'm not sure about his stance on environmental issues.

I like Libertarians more than Republicans because they actually do stick to their fiscally conservative guns.  I'm all for the reduction of the national debt, I just disagree on the means to acheive reducing the national debt and don't think the time to start being fiscally conservative is the middle of a recession verging on depression.

Republicans are for the most part fiscally conservative in name only. So in many ways I don't see eye-to-eye with Republicans on just about anything considering how socially conservative the party has become.

I think its the recent economic turmoil that has brought all these economic issues to the forefront, which is why there has been so much arguing about them to the exclusion of other issues.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

akuma587 said:
TheRealMafoo said:
akuma587 said:
Mafoo's kind of outside what most Republicans believe. Mafoo is pretty libertarian but is also more pro-military than most libertarians.

Tyrannical is more in line with the "Republican philosophy".

This, although I think most libertarians are for a strong military. I have a very strong respect for the people in our military, even though I dislike the decision by our politicians to go to war in Iraq.

As for people calling me “right wing” earlier, that's funny. We have been talking about fiscal responsibility in these forums. If we were talking about abortion, gay rights, legalizing drugs, or any number of other social responsibilities, the last thing people would call me is “right wing” ;)

 

Yeah, ironically for how many fights me and Mafoo get in the only issues we really disagree on are the government's role in the economy (obviously that is a pretty big issue) and the degree to which we are "pro-military."  Other than that, we don't disagree on very much.  I'm not sure about his stance on environmental issues.

I like Libertarians more than Republicans because they actually do stick to their fiscally conservative guns.  I'm all for the reduction of the national debt, I just disagree on the means to acheive reducing the national debt and don't think the time to start being fiscally conservative is the middle of a recession verging on depression.

Republicans are for the most part fiscally conservative in name only. So in many ways I don't see eye-to-eye with Republicans on just about anything considering how socially conservative the party has become.

I think its the recent economic turmoil that has brought all these economic issues to the forefront, which is why there has been so much arguing about them to the exclusion of other issues.

 

 

Why would you want the debt to be lowered. And of course Republicans aren't responsible, their politicians. Someone get the guillotine.



 

 

Around the Network

A Ronald Reagan avatar???!! Seriously?



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.

blaydcor said:
A Ronald Reagan avatar???!! Seriously?

Seriously.  The Gipper could smooth talk Obama at his own game.

 



By the way, that was not a good 'seriously' or a bad one, literally just surprise



Crusty VGchartz old timer who sporadically returns & posts. Let's debate nebulous shit and expand our perpectives. Or whatever.

@Blay Oh ok. It's this new lingo I tell you....too tricky for us old folks to comprehend



halogamer1989 said:
@Blay Oh ok. It's this new lingo I tell you....too tricky for us old folks to comprehend

nice 2 see u back.