Obama Hate: Adding Up The Threads
whats is this 9? 10?
Obama Hate: Adding Up The Threads
whats is this 9? 10?
| SciFiBoy said: Obama Hate: Adding Up The Threads whats is this 9? 10? |
This is the first mention of Obama in this thread.
TheRealMafoo said:
This is the first mention of Obama in this thread. |
so you blame Bush as well?
and your other thread on Obama being dumb was what? a slip of the tounge? Obama is not perfect, but compared to Bush or McCain, he is alot better.
SciFiBoy said:
so you blame Bush as well? |
Yes, I blame Bush as well.
And Obama is not a lot better, in fact he is exactly the same. The only good things he has done, any none “religious nut job” would have done.
Aside from reversing a few things of Bush's, he has done nothing positive.
Hillary would have been a far better president. At least she has led something in her life. As one person before me said, Obama has never run a hot dog stand, let along a country.
Hillary and I don't see eye to eye, but at least she can see a retarded idea, and know it's retarded. Obama has no clue.
TheRealMafoo said:
Yes, I blame Bush as well. |
what exactly did Bush do? The world's economy crash was started way before Clinton was in office. If you want to blame anyone blame the banks of the world. NO single president is the cause of this.


ssj12 said:
what exactly did Bush do? The world's economy crash was started way before Clinton was in office. If you want to blame anyone blame the banks of the world. NO single president is the cause of this. |
Catch the "as well"?
No single president is to blame... they all are, for the last 38 years. You're hired to lead this country, and that means fix it's problems. Every president from 1971 had a chance to fix our dollar. People saw this coming, for decades.
When the US empire falls, (all empires fall) it will be for the same reason every empire has fallen. The destruction of our money.
When people look back at our empire (in however many hundred years away that is), and look for the single deciding factor as to why we fell, they can point to August 15, 1971.
That's the day that brought down the US.
http://economics.about.com/cs/money/a/gold_standard.htm
TheRealMafoo said:
This is not the problem. |
People are not taxed out, you really don't get it do you, in real terms US taxes are among the lowest in the developed world.
Also at the moment inflation is down, right now the concern is deflation not inflation
Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)
| Avinash_Tyagi said: People are not taxed out, you really don't get it do you, in real terms US taxes are among the lowest in the developed world.
Also at the moment inflation is down, right now the concern is deflation not inflation |
I guess I should have rephrased.
Almost all of our tax dollars come from the top 5% income earners. If you raise taxes on them, you will not collect any more money.
You could raise taxes on the poor and middle class and increase government income, but most people think that's counterproductive when entering a depression.
Being that I apparently don't get it, enlighten me with your wisdom. If you were president, what would you do?
TheRealMafoo said:
I guess I should have rephrased. |
Actually you will get more revenue, you do realize that taxes on the rich used to be much higher, and our revenues, (adjusted of course) were higher than they are now, you do realize that we used to be a lending nation not a debtor nation with those higher taxes on the rich. Nowadays however the rich aren't shouldering their share
Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Actually you will get more revenue, you do realize that taxes on the rich used to be much higher, and our revenues, (adjusted of course) were higher than they are now, you do realize that we used to be a lending nation not a debtor nation with those higher taxes on the rich. Nowadays however the rich aren't shouldering their share |
The rich have always paid 19.5% of the GDP, regardless of how much you tax them.
Raising taxes on them does not generate more dollars. In fact, it generates less, as the GDP will fall. You can raise taxes on the middle class and poor however, and collect more dollars.