phinch1 said: ok maybe i was being a bit annoying , but it annoys me when people say PSN has nothing on XBL when i have just stated several things it can do that XBL cant and all they can say back is, cause its better, prove it lol because i want to end this stupid argument on here that i've seen on so many forums |
Dude seriously, ask yourself this. Why doesnt these 60 player online games have millions of regular players? Do you think it's fluke that the 360 has games where millions of people regularly play?
Coming from my friend who is an avid PC online shooter, more than 24 players sucks arse for many reasons. Not least spawn killing. After playing Resistance 2 myself, I would choose a 10 player online shooter any day. And the fact that Gears 2 is just that and whips Res 2 online is a testament to more doesnt mean better.
Of course Live can do more than 60 online shooter. Ever heard of Huxley? Rumoured out this year? MAG has 250 online was it? Huxley tested succesfully over 1000. Huxley is an MMOFPS for PC and 360.
I would rather pay £34.99/ year and have no disconnections than be disconnected 4 - 5 times an hour on certain games with PSN.
And if the 360 had a browser I would never use it. I have a PC thanks. Consoles are for games. That where Sony have gone wrong this gen.
In no way is this a dig at Sony or the PS3. It's pointing out the flawed philosphey of a fanboy. And yes Live has alot of ENTERTAINMENT stuff that PSN doesnt. Notice I didnt say Browser or operating system?