By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Do you think that Killzone 2 has better graphics than Crysis?

vthokiesrmoo on 28 February 2009

Maybe not every texture or every part of it looks better. The way the game looks as you play it is a much better presentation than Crysis.



PSN ID= bigdaddymoo

 

MSI GT725-074 owner..... TRUE BEAST.. COD4 is a different game on PC.

Around the Network
Infamy79 on 28 February 2009
dolemit3 said:

The settings are very different so it's hard to compare:

 

I'm sorry, but those two pictures are night and day in quality difference. Crysis is crystal clear, amazing detail perfect shadows. KZ2 is muddy with low res textures in comparison. It looks great for a console game, but it's strength is it's animations, not pure graphics grunt.



Never argue with idiots
They bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience

colonelstubbs on 28 February 2009

Nobody sane thinks k2 is better looking than crysis



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

Pristine20 on 28 February 2009
Kantor said:
No, but that's an unfair comparison. What hardware does Crysis on Very High need to run, and what hardware does Killzone 2 need to run?

Crysis: A NASA supercomputer

Killzone 2: A PS3.

^this lol. Crysis is the obvious winner

 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Serious_frusting on 28 February 2009

I am more impressed by KZ2 to be honest it just has more of an atmosphere then Crysis ever could. I hate the way the leaves look on the trees in Crysis so. The open world level design is meh at best so KZ2 >????> Crysis. However i do feel that the crytek engine is more then good enough to make a game that looks better then KZ2



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Around the Network
makingmusic476 on 28 February 2009

Hah, no.

Though I do think it looks better artistically. I like my games a bit more stylized, whether it be like Killzone or Super Mario Galaxy.



makingmusic476 on 28 February 2009
Reasonable said:
No. For me graphics isn't just the resolution, etc - which Crysis would win anyway - but what the engine can handle while giving yoy those graphics.

In COD4, KZ2, Gears 2, etc. the console requires sacrifices in physics, etc. to be made, limits on level size, etc.

On a decent gaming PC Crysis has not only great graphics but requires far less sacrifices.

In COD4 despite all the great sparks, etc. everything is essentially nailed down. KZ2 has slightly more destructible environments but still a lot of stuff is nailed down.

In Crysis, not only do you get at least comparable (and I'd argue clearly superior) visuals, but without those sacrifices. Little in Crysis is nailed down, and the maps don't force your path to hide how small levels really are, that coupled with the graphics for me puts it a fair way ahead of any console title, including KZ2 (which I'm playing and really enjoying BTW).

 

I agree with this.  And it makes me realize how bad I need an upgrade.