I have been thinking about this the past few weeks. Forgive me if there's been a discussion on this, but I'd love to hear everyone's view on this.
Although I'd label my self as a hard-right conservative (both socially and fiscally), I can't help but think about a few things.
If you did not know, Mexico is in a near-civil war over the drug trade. 5,000 people died last year over it, and the drug lords are very well armed, trained, and brutally killing cops & soldiers over the drug running trade that Mexico is so valliantly fighting against.
I can't help but think this though: The only reason the drug runners are doing what they do, is because they're the only ones allowed to do it, and there's an incredible amount of profit in the drug trade. Growing weed (AFAIK) isn't much more difficult than growing a tomato, yet one sells for far more per pound.
Because of this, I can't help but think that, as Americans (and the stupid ones that do drugs), we've built up regimes in foreign countries, and regimes in our own back yards: meth labs, coke factories, weed gardens, ect. All replete with their own version(s) of the 20 and 30's-esque gangsters. Again, it's due to the immense risk-reward factor that 1 kilo of coke retails for $85,000 as of 2006 - 1 small brick is equal to 2 years of pay in America....So why not risk it to live in luxury?
If America decided to legalize the production of said drugs in specific areas, and taxed them heavily (although not as heavily as to bring the price in eqivilent with current 3rd world prices), it could render a win-win situation: We get the drug trade out of the evil drug lord's hands, and the govt. has a new pet to tax.
What is everyone's opinion on this? Although I hate drugs with an intense passion, I can't help but wonder that since we've made them illegal, we've built up many horrible regimes worldwide. If we took the profit away from them, they would be forced to go into another more difficult trade.
Just a crazy idea.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.













